Jews & Hollywood: Advances ‘Soft Assault’ On Christian Imagery (and Arabs of course)!
If you want to be notified the next time I write something, sign up for FREE email alerts or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
A new master piece article by Wendy Campbell, Mark Green. Wendy and Mark are documentary filmmakers from Southern California. Their documentary films can be found at the website of their company, Marwen Media.
Thanks to Robert Lindsay (An Independent Left Journalist From California), who send a trackback to my post “Do Jews Run Hollywood?“, through which I came across this piece. (more on this subject from my archive: “Who Rules America?”)
And now on to the Article:
Subliminal propaganda radiates from The Big Screen
By Mark Green and Wendy Campbell
April 2005
“I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people in gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
-James Madison, 1788
Edison may have invented the ‘motion picture’, but Jewish immigrants from Europe “invented Hollywood”. Remarkably, in the century since Meyer, the Warner brothers and a handful of other Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants began the ’studio system’; Hollywood still maintains a distinctly Yiddish accent.
Some critics, however, posit that Hollywood doesn’t play fair, since it employs the mesmerizing power of cinema to manipulate the mindset of complacent viewers. How? By relentlessly injecting sordid scenarios and denigrating images of once respected American archetypes and institutions. Latest targets: the Catholic Church and, as usual, Arabs.
One very recent example (out of many) is the comic-book-styled action flick “Sin City”. In it we witness numerous oddball villains, many adorned with multiple layers of crucifixion crosses (a symbol revered by many Christians) as they go about their merry, murderous ways. Indeed, the film’s arch-villain turns out to be nothing less than a satanic, cannibalistic Catholic cardinal!
OK, this is fictional entertainment, but Hollywood knows that these scenarios have a visceral, even subliminal, impact. That’s basically why we don’t see any Hollywood-fabricated demons sporting Stars of David (a symbol revered by many Jews) nor do we see any ‘rabid rabbis” dished up for popular entertainment.
The unspoken code of Hollywood is this: Jewish archetypes and religious sensitivities are to be respected. Others may be casually smeared.
Although Catholics and Arabs are expected to survive this non-lethal onslaught, when one considers the laudatory treatment Hollywood grants Jewish and Israeli characters, it’s becoming an insult. How is it that Jews, Arabs and Christians receive such different treatment under Hollywood’s gaze?
In polite terms, the Jewish presence in American film and media is “without peer”.
In many ways, Hollywood is an “insider” kind of business. While talent is essential, there is a political element to success in Hollywood. One must pass muster with the specifically Jewish dictates of political correctness. Otherwise, one may find oneself very unemployed. It took an actor/producer with the stature of Mel Gibson to buck this kosher Hollywood code and produce his controversial, but wildly successful, film “The Passion”.
Even Gibson however had to endure a tidal wave of organized Jewish protest, including death threats to his family. To no one’s surprise, Bob and Harvey Weinstein of Miramax Films declined to distribute Gibson’s “The Passion”, in no small part because it offended many Jews and was accused of stoking the “eternal flames” of anti-Semitism.
On the other hand, the Weinstein brothers did distribute “Sin City” as well as Michael Moore’s much ballyhooed “Fahrenheit 9/11″. Why? Both films respected the unwritten kosher code: vilification of Arabs and/or Christians is acceptable, but one must never — even in the context of analyzing terrorism or U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East — demonize Israel or Zionism.
Indeed, in “Fahrenheit 9/11″, Michael Moore’s controversial “expose” actually managed to keep Israel, Zionism (and even neo-conservatism) completely off the cinematic radar. Moore did provide acceptable doses of Saudi-bashing as well as enough innuendo to bolster the Leftist, politically correct, view that U.S. Mideast policies are “ALL about oil”. He’s been the darling of liberal Hollywood circles ever since.
With that in mind, it’s important that the aspiring filmmaker should remember these three things:
One: Jews tend to occupy the top of the Hollywood food chain.
Two: They intend to remain there.
Three: Don’t forget those first two things.
Like it or not, the “gatekeepers” of American mass media are disproportionately ‘Israeli-American’. Though Tinseltown famously disdains “white (non-Jewish) racism”, prevailing Hollywood customs affirm industry-wide Jewish networking. The results are nothing less than astounding.
America, many now acknowledge, has come to “think Jewish “, as attitudes have magically shifted on matters such as race, “minority rights”, school prayer, “abortion rights”, celebrating “the holidays”, and “promoting our nation’s values” via militant democracy-building in all Mideast countries except Israel.
OK, Israel may qualify as a “democracy” in the same way that white, apartheid South Africa did. However, but there’s one huge difference: concerted intervention from around the world finally brought the South African segregated, apartheid system to its knees. White racial discrimination has been declared “evil”.
Significantly, Jewish activists played a decisive role in the anti-apartheid movement. Yet Israel suffers no comparable level of opprobrium. Pressures on the Jewish state to abandon its commitment to legally sanctioned segregation are meager compared to the pressure leveled on South Africa. Israel is in a class by itself.
Further, it is no accident that Israeli “security” is now the centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy.
How are the highly placed “friends of Israel” able to bamboozle so much of the world? Through a complicated but interconnected array of propaganda, political pressure, complex legalisms, victim identity (see: The Holocaust) and raw political muscle. In today’s America, just an allegation of anti-Semitism can damage the career of any public figure.
And to sustain this perspective, Americans are supplied a regular dose of Holocaust lore. As a sidebar, here’s an additional fact that would be funny if only it wasn’t true: Holocaust “experts” are virtually all Jewish. Does their collective obsession produce scholarship — or a license to propagandize?
In any case, for the latest Holocaust news, one needs simply to turn on the TV or pick up any major newspaper. Yet an accurate telling of the Jewish experience in America in the past 40 years would spotlight not suffering or persecution, but success, acceptance, privilege and influence. Jews are now America’s preeminent success story.
Although reportedly less than 2% of our population, Jewish per capita income is unsurpassed, as is their presence at our nation’s top universities and think tanks. As noted, American Jews make up a majority of Hollywood’s ruling class and beyond that, Jewish ‘over-representation’ is an accomplished fact in law, journalism, and publishing.
This is no small matter. With the average American watching over four hours of TV or film every day (and perusing mainstream newspapers and magazines, too) these figures are evidence of a profound ethnic imbalance in the management and dissemination of news and information. For America’s Jewish community, this translates into unrivaled political power. The enduring fact remains that whoever owns and manages the media can also leverage public opinion, and from there, government policies.
Indeed, Jewish media mavens have the means to easily advance their particular view of history, with far-reaching consequences. And with the Jewish state of Israel embroiled perpetual conflict since its founding in 1948, the question must be posed: might many of our country’s most accomplished producers, editors and story-tellers have at least a minor conflict of interest?
Put another way: how can they NOT?
After all, Israeli “security” remains the essential focus of organized Jewry. Countless pro-Israel organizations are famous for applying incessant pressure on government officials, political parties, candidates, journalists and fellow ‘tribe-members’ to lobby on Israel’s behalf, assuring an uninterrupted flow of billions of dollars annually in U.S. aid to the Jewish state.
Consequently, maintaining a public willingness to favor America’s present interventionist, (pro-Israel/anti-Arab) foreign policy is an essential component in any scenario culminating in the Final Zionist Triumph. It’s essential therefore that American Gentiles “think correctly” on key Jewish issues. Thus, many complex political issues are ‘dumbed down’ for mass consumption.
Good and evil are drawn neatly in back and white, so that American consumers of news and entertainment can easily draw the proper conclusion. Arabs (particularly Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation) are therefore “terrorists”, Nazi demonology is a growth industry, and Holocaust Revisionism (widely misrepresented as “Holocaust Denial”) is peddled as a veritable threat to world order.
It’s a staggering fact that in numerous “free, Western democracies” (such as Germany, Canada, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, and others) it’s a crime to question the official Jewish death toll figures or the gas chamber story in the events now called The Holocaust. Penalties include fines and actual imprisonment!
Holocaust heretic Ernst Zundel was deported from the U.S. to Canada where he spent two years in solitary confinement. Now he sits in a German prison. Who’s next?
A balanced, accurate view of history matters, yet when the facts don’t fit, the media gatekeepers can purposefully misinterpret, obfuscate or simply overlook them. This may explain why, for instance, there is so little media interest in the annihilation of 20 million anti-Bolshevik Russians preceding WWII.
After all, the killing of 20 million Russians BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT is the all-time tsunami of war crimes. Who were the perpetrators? Where are they now? Did they receive American cover? Do they still? In addition, the average American simply knows nothing about the “over-represented” Jewish role in Communism’s insidious rise. This too is no accident.
Considering that some 275 million people have perished in wars during the past century, America’s nurtured obsession with, and elevation of, Jewish suffering in Europe during WWII might be seen as a peculiar idiosyncrasy. Indeed, many have concluded that the American Mind is under Israeli management.
The irony of our nation’s preoccupation with Jewish war casualties 60 years after the fact becomes even more unpleasant when we consider the horrendous, ONGOING persecution of Palestinians in the Holy Land under Jewish occupation. The fundamental Palestinian crime: residing in Israel without proper Jewish DNA.
As for American cinema, there has been a sea of changes in the past generation. There’s now a multicultural array of celebrities, including many Jewish ones. On the other hand, Christianity doesn’t get the kind of coverage it enjoyed when Frank Capra was directing. Thus, we are treated to seeing an array of stock Christian mobsters, whores and charlatans. As for Arabs, they’re still welcome to play terrorist schemers or religious fanatics.
This is the mean side to American film that goes unacknowledged and unchallenged. Recently, after reading numerous glowing reviews, we succumbed to seeing the afore-mentioned over-praised, action-revenge flick, “Sin City”. Directed by Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez (with “special guest director” Quentin Tarantino), “Sin City” is a gritty, sexy and surrealistic foray into a violent post-modern metropolis.
By contemporary standards, this film delivers more than its share of violence, though there’s certainly worse in circulation. In “Sin City”, the denigration of Christian icons, however, approaches new highs (lows?), something that was also very evident in Tarantino’s previous “Kill Bill” movies.
“Sin City” even manages to associate blue eyes with depravity, although for Hollywood that’s nothing new. The film’s two heroic characters (and they were not wearing any Christian symbols) were portrayed by Mickey Rourke and Bruce Willis. It’s Willis who finally manages to kill the evil Catholic priest. It was designed to be a stirring moment.
At any rate, we can rest assured that Hollywood will refrain from depicting Jews in such negative fashion. As for the rest of us, we’re supposed to buy tickets, eat popcorn and not complain. In fact, we’re not even supposed to NOTICE, since it might suggest racial loyalty which, for (non-Jewish) white Americans, is a modern sin.
These very real double standards speak volumes about who holds real power in contemporary America.
******************************
Some suggestions: Create your own narrative. Recognize subversive imagery. Reject double standards. Establish new media. Break new grounds. Question taboos. Eschew passivity. Take action!
******************************
Mark Green and Wendy Campbell practice what they preach. For more information about their views and their taboo-shattering documentaries, please visit their website.
I found few more interesting articles at their website which I will present later.
Enjoy this post? Get future updates sent to you for free! Join by 
16 Comments on “Jews & Hollywood: Advances ‘Soft Assault’ On Christian Imagery (and Arabs of course)!”
It’s hilarious when they argue that Mel Gibson’s movie was… anti-Semitic! It seems to me that anything that shows their wrongdoings is now termed as “anti-Semitic”. I didn’t like Gibson’s movie, but also didn’t think it was anti-Semitic in any way… ?!?! The funny thing is, by alleging it was anti-Semitic they caused those who weren’t even interested in seeing it in the first place (like myself) to want to go and see it! And I know of many people who watched it just because of that.
I hated Fahrenheit 9/11. I expected at least one mention of “Israel” but walked away without even hearing the word “zionism”. It seems to me it was nothing other than a …. Democrat propaganda. In other words, don’t upset the zionists (remember Kerry’s words that he would still support “Israel” if he’s elected?) but take a more harsh stance on the neo-cons’ cooperation with the oil-rich Saudis.
Hollywood “liberalism” is a joke. Actually, scratch that. American liberalism is a joke.
Of course, Wendy Campbell’s argument is asinine.
While virtually every paragraph of her article contains factual errors or misrepresentations, there are a couple of very obvious points worth making.
First, Campbell offers no actual evidence for any of her assertions about Hollywood. In America, most industries contain disproportionate numbers of some ethnic minority. Hollywood is no different.
Second, if the last election taught us anything, it is that Hollywood has very little political power. The Hollywood establishment gave countless millions of dollars to defeat George W. Bush. Obviously, it failed.
Third, the Hollywood establishment gave this money to defeat Bush even though Bush has been a stronger supporter of Israel than any previous American president. If Hollywood is controlled by Jews, and if Jews are behind America’s support for Israel, why did Hollywood oppose Bush’s reelection?
Fourth, 76% of Jewish voters in the United States voted against Bush in 2004. Among ethnic groups, only blacks opposed him in larger numbers. Again, if Jewish political power is behind America’s support for Israel, why did Jews vote against Bush?
America did not support Israel to any meaningful degree until 1967. It did so in that war because the key Arab powers allied themselves with the Soviet Union, the enemy of the United States. Nassar took Soviet arms, and an Arab victory in that war threatened to extend Soviet influence throughout the Middle East. Had there been no war in 1967, had Nassar not attacked Israel, America’s interest in access to Arab oil would have overwhelmed support for Israel among American voters.
However justified Palestinian Arabs may feel, they have somehow found a way to ally themselves with America’s enemies in every war for 100 years. In World War I, the Palestinian Arabs sided with the Ottomon Turks. During World War II, leading Palestinian Arabs took aid from Germany, and the Mufti of Jerusalem befriended Hitler. During the Cold War, the Palestinian Arabs befriended the Soviet Union long before the United States supported Israel to any meaningful degree. When Saddam attacked Kuwait in 1991, Palestinian Arabs again chose opposition to America’s ally (Kuwait) and support of its enemy (Iraq). Finally, on September 11, 2001, Palestinian Arabs danced in the streets with joy. All the world saw these photographs.
Now, you might say that the Palestinian Arabs had good reasons to oppose America’s allies and support its enemies in each of these cases. But the fact is, this is what they did. They have never, ever supported America in any endeavor. Until they do, why should any American voter support any policy that benefits them? However oppressive Israel might be (and it is no more oppressive or seperatist than any number of Arab regimes), on what basis do Palestinian Arabs base their claim for American support?
Tigerhawk, as I said earlier, Kerry didn’t have a different position on “Israel”, so it doesn’t really matter which side the Jews supported. Moreover, Hollywood while not having political power, has a huge propaganda power and thereby influence over public opinion (sadly).
And you are wrong on 1967. The Arabs allied themselves with the Soviet Union only after the Suez war and the Israeli alliance with the Western powers Britain and France. In fact, America had been supportive of Israel even before that. After the Suez war, when Israel, Britain, and France conspired to and successfully occupied the Sinai until the Suez canal, USA did not do much about it, and the Soviets had to issue a strict warning to “Israel” which resulted in their withdrawal in lightning speed. So now you see that the Arabs never really expressed much of a priority as to who came to their defense. The big powers decided it for themselves, and the smaller powers (at the time small, when it comes to “Israel”) could do nothing but await their weapons sales / offers. The dynamics have changed now, but it wasn’t so back in the 50s and 60s.
Moreover, Nasser was not by any means anti-”Israel”. It was not as simple as that. He was, until the Suez campaign very much ready to (and indeed did) sit for talks with “Israel”. “Israel”, however, proved time and again that it was more willing to occupy more and more and more land (including the DMZ) than having the peace with Arabs that it supposedly yearned for. Nasser’s stance changed very suddenly, but it was only after the “Israeli” military campaign. In fact, Nasser was very smart indeed and knew that such a thing was going to happen again, and much worse, with a diplomatically stronger “Israel” and a lower possibility that the same withdrawal would take place as it happened after the Suez war.
And before you accuse the Muftis of befriending Hitler, you must first look at the more embarassing facts - zionists befriended Hitler and indeed endorsed his campaign long before any Mufti or Arab leader did. If we’re going to play this blame game, zionists would come out much worse, I can assure you.
As for “why should any American voter support any policy that benefits them?”, I will ask the same question, “why should any American voter support any policcy that benefits those who 1) attacked their ships in international waters and later on lied and claimed that it was by mistake [same old lies] 2) use their tax dollars to murder innocent human beings 3) cause the spread of “terrorism” (are you also going to argue that if USA supported Arab countries and attacked “Israel” like it attacked Iraq, Arabs would be against USA let alone attack it?)
and 4) spied on them 5) sold their weapons tech to their enemies… 6) carried out false flag operations that resulted in U.S action against the innocent country.
Admit it, “Israel” has been the most irresponsible slave of the big powers to have ever graced history. That they have acquired so much power (especially nuclear) might be good for them (although I have my doubts about that in the long run), but it most certainly has not been good for their allies and protectors USA. To cut a long story short, the winds of change might blow in any direction at any given time. In fact, “it will be much worse before it gets any better” is what I am thinking of.
in re Dan Marsden:
Fahrenheit 9/11 was about the September 11th attacks and about general Bush incompetence. Exactly what did Michael Moore leave out? What does Israel have to do with 9/11?
Nothing, I’d say, unless the neo-nazis who dumped hate lit on my lawn are right?
C.B.
Denial is not an answer to hundreds of articles, books, TV reports, etc… about Zionist involvement in 9/11.
Simply calling the guys behind publishing these facts a neo-nazis or evil himself does not make me feel sympathy for Israel!
“Fahrenheit 9/11 was about the September 11th attacks and about general Bush incompetence.”
And Bush is incompetent only with 9/11? Hello? It was the entire American policy in the Middle East that was blowing up in their face (if it was indeed the doing of Bin Laden & co.). Bush’s incompetence??! 9/11 was NOT about domestic unrest….
“What does Israel have to do with 9/11?”
Isn’t that the question…
“Nothing, I’d say, unless the neo-nazis who dumped hate lit on my lawn are right?”
What? So the “Israelis” or Jews for that matter can never be behind any wrongdoings because that would mean that the neo-Nazis are right?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?! What kind of logic is that? Or are you just being sarcastic? Boy, I sure hope you are!
Thx for linking to this piece Sabbah. It’s an honor to be linked from your page. Also to be linked from Brown Bloggers Brigade and Jordan Planet. I love my Arab brothers and I’m honored to be on their pages.
Anyway, regarding Israel and 9-11, IMO, the best evidence indicates that US law enforcement, including the FBI, have reason to believe that the Israeli Mossad may have known about the plot beforehand and done nothing about it. They may have more involvement than that, but that’s not proven yet.
Re: Tigerhawk’s comments, as I noted on my blog, the Jewish takeover of Hollywood was IMO the result of a conspiracy amongst a small number of Jews from Galicia 100 years ago. The conspiracy has been ongoing in a sense ever since, as Jews have increased and consolidated their control over MY film industry. To this day, they practice *major* discrimation against non-Jews in the industry and I am not happy about that one bit!
These Jews took over Hollywood for one reason, to advance the tribal interests of the Jews and to attack the enemies and rivals of the Jews. Also to accumulate a lot of money and power for the Jews. This is raw naked ethnic warfare, and we look down on this here in the USA. The Jews are one of the only groups here anymore that wages ethnic warfare on other groups and IMO, it’s *not cool*!
Jews in the USA need to be Americans first and Jews second, not the other way around. Re: Hollywood trying to defeat Bush, I have mixed feelings about Hollywood Jews, since I hung out in Hollywood for years. They are very liberal people so I like them in many ways. Basically, Hollywood Jews are liberals first, and Jews second. On my blog in my notes about this piece, I note that the Hollywood Jew is not your average Jew. They are very secular, highly irrerevent, very liberal, mostly male, hedonistic and rather assimilated. Anyway, Kerry was pro-Israel too.
Jewish political power IS behind US support for Israel, to a large degree, though there are other factors. This is the dirty little secret of US politics and I assure you that 100% of the people on the Hill learn this fact very quickly. You are free to deny the obvious all you wish.
America began supporting Israel after JFK’s assassination, which is one reason why some suspect Mossad was involved in the killing. It dates back to JFK, 1964. After 1967 War, support for Israel exploded as the Israeli-Jewish Lobby finally got started in the US, and Jews started to support Israel a lot more. It just jelled after that. Kissinger came in and really turned US policy radically towards Israel, especially after 73 War. You know the story ever since.
Most Americans do not know that “Palestinians supported US enemies in various wars” and I suspect many do not care either. Palestinians do not have need for US support and won’t get it anytime soon anyway. But Israel has been a total disaster for the US, IMO. Due to Israel, we are in Iraq, we have suffered many attacks and terrorist attacks. It’s just senseless. The notion that Israel is no more oppressive or separatist than its Arab neighbors is a very difficult case to make. The separatist bit is false on its face. Israel is much more separatist than most Arab nations.
Me: “What does Israel have to do with 9/11?”
Dan Marsden: Isn’t that the question…
Oh, so you don’t know either?
* Par-don me if I am a bit suspicious of neo-nazis!
* Hollywood and the newsmedia aren’t the same. The news media is huge. Saying the Jews control the media is like saying the Jews control the stock market..it is impossible. Nobody controls either one.
* Speaking of the stock market, the media works very much in the same way. The media’s primary concern is mooh-lah. Better stories = higher ratings = more mooh-lah. IF Israel were involved in 9/11, it would’ve been a HUGE story. The networks would’ve been falling all over each other to report it first.
* Since they are concerned with mooh-lah, the networks are in high competition with each other. Being wrong = less credibility = less ratings = less mooh-lah. Remember when CBS got that document thing wrong? The others would not shut up about it for many weeks. It is a business where you can not afford to be wrong. You can’t afford to be unfair, because the others will call you on it.
* After 9/11 I was glued to CNN. I heard the Mossad idea tossed around, talked about…and rejected. It did not hold up. As I said, if there were any amount of truth to it, the media would’ve been all over it…but no.
* It would not have made any sense for the Mossad to do such a thing, to fail to prevent 9/11. If the Mossad had prevented 9/11, they would’ve come out looking like total heroes.
Maybe you have missed this report: http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/01/19/who-rules-america/
Hello there CB. It is not only neo-Nazis saying that the Mossad may have had some involvement in 9-11. It is our very own top law enforcement officers, including the US FBI. Of course, they said this off the record, but it is all there in a Fox News Special with Carl Cameron. I will see if I can find the quotes for you. If not, just hunt down the report on the web. Now personally, I am not convinced of Mossad involvement, but I am suspicious.
Furthermore, it is obvious the Al Qaeda did 9-11. Re: US government foreknowledge or allowing the attack to happen, that is much more controversial, and I am agnostic. However, there is a a large body of evidence accumulated in favor of this theory, if one wishes to check it out. I regard it as unproven at the moment.
Re: Jews do not control the media. This is the classic silly rejoinder. IOW, if Jews do not *completely* control the US media, then they cannot be said to control it at all! Ridiculous. In 1983, a prominent Jewish author estimated that 59% of the media elite were Jewish. The # has surely only gone up since then. Though “Who Controls the Media?” was written by scumbags, their scholarship on this issue has been impeccable.
Shall we say: there is enough Jewish domination over our media to the point where they considerably influence our media, and the Gentiles in the media are either in bed with the Jews or frightened of them. Furthermore, many editors and writers are frightened of the Israeli/Jewish Lobby in the US, which mobilizes the moment a paper prints something critical to the Lobby.
There is also the proven tactic of the Jewish boycott, which has been repeatedly wielded in the US. The average paper lasts 18 months in the face of a Jewish boycott. I have a BA in journalism and I assure you that anyone in the field knows these facts, for to be ignorant of them is career suicide.
Jews do not control the US stock market, or the US or world banks anymore, thank God, after the rest of us ran them out of it and repulsed an unsuccessful Jewish assault on the US banking system in the 1920’s. Read Henry Ford for the details of this Jewish attack, which was only repulsed by racial solidarity of the non-Jewish bankers. At the moment, world banking is pretty much nonracial.
US Jews do play a *central* role in the US stock market, but to say they are dominant or controlling is false. However, US Jews are dominant in a few other fields, including retail sales, precious jewels, esp the diamond trade and furs. There may be a few others.
It is well-known that Jews dominate both the US media and Hollywood. I hung out in Hollywood for years and everyone who works there knows this, in fact, people casually remark on it all the time. Want to get an acting role? Pretend to be Jewish! Wear a star of David on your neck.
The Jews who dominate the US media will not let most Jewish-critical or Israeli-critical stories see the light of day. Listen kiddo, let me tell you how it works ok, from a guy who has been an editor in the US media. As a young reporter, you may try to file and Israeli-critical or Jewish-critical story. Once. You will be called into the editors’ office, and he will let you know that you are NOT to write this type of story anymore. You WILL get the hint. If not, you WILL be fired. Got it?
No matter how big a story Mossad-9-11 may be, the powers that be in the media will never let it see the light of day. Tribal loyalty of the media Jews trumps their massive greed any day of the week.
CBS did not get any kind of document thing wrong, they were played by White House conartists and fell for a diabolical con. Karl Rove planted a fake document with CBS in an effort to destroy CBS and Dan Rather. If the media were punished for being wrong, all the US news channels and every paper would have been shut down years ago because they’re all wrong constantly.
The big media is massively unfair, all the time, and the rest of the media is terrified to call them on it, because of “examples” like what the rightwing lynch mob did to Dan Rather. Read Chomsky. We have a *controlled* media in the US, not too dissimilar to Sabbah’s Jordan!
Re: 9-11 and Mossad, go dig up the Fox News Report. It’s all over the net, esp. at whatreallyhappened.com. It’s a real eye-opener. Of course, Fox killed the story a few weeks later and then tried to *permanently remove it* from their websites (GEE why did they do THAT I wonder?) but many copied it.
Mossad is one of the dirtiest, snakiest, evillest, most lowdown, most wildcard agencies on the face of the Earth. They are brilliant and professional and capable of most anything. They have deliberately attacked US buildings and ships before, and they failed to warn us of the bombing of the Marine barracks in 1983, because they wanted the bombing to go down. Do not trust them!
Haitham, someone is accusing you of anti-Semitism, on the Semitism.net blog….
Thought I’d let you know, in case he didn’t trackback you………
http://www.semitism.net/node/view/129
Dan. Thanks for the note!
“Par-don me if I am a bit suspicious of neo-nazis!”
Nah, you’re just obsessed with your smear campaign and witch-hunt.
“IF Israel were involved in 9/11, it would’ve been a HUGE story.”
Like the big story that USS Liberty was…. Yup.
The media talks about these things? Please? The media doesn’t mention “Israel’s” long history of terrorism and sabotage, including but not limited to the Lavon Affair, Libyan affair, USS Liberty, etc. Who are you kidding?