Nah, you’re just obsessed with your smear campaign and witch-hunt.

“IF Israel were involved in 9/11, it would’ve been a HUGE story.”

Like the big story that USS Liberty was…. Yup.

The media talks about these things? Please? The media doesn’t mention “Israel’s” long history of terrorism and sabotage, including but not limited to the Lavon Affair, Libyan affair, USS Liberty, etc. Who are you kidding?

Thought I’d let you know, in case he didn’t trackback you………

http://www.semitism.net/node/view/129

Furthermore, it is obvious the Al Qaeda did 9-11. Re: US government foreknowledge or allowing the attack to happen, that is much more controversial, and I am agnostic. However, there is a a large body of evidence accumulated in favor of this theory, if one wishes to check it out. I regard it as unproven at the moment.

Re: Jews do not control the media. This is the classic silly rejoinder. IOW, if Jews do not *completely* control the US media, then they cannot be said to control it at all! Ridiculous. In 1983, a prominent Jewish author estimated that 59% of the media elite were Jewish. The # has surely only gone up since then. Though “Who Controls the Media?” was written by scumbags, their scholarship on this issue has been impeccable.

Shall we say: there is enough Jewish domination over our media to the point where they considerably influence our media, and the Gentiles in the media are either in bed with the Jews or frightened of them. Furthermore, many editors and writers are frightened of the Israeli/Jewish Lobby in the US, which mobilizes the moment a paper prints something critical to the Lobby.

There is also the proven tactic of the Jewish boycott, which has been repeatedly wielded in the US. The average paper lasts 18 months in the face of a Jewish boycott. I have a BA in journalism and I assure you that anyone in the field knows these facts, for to be ignorant of them is career suicide.

Jews do not control the US stock market, or the US or world banks anymore, thank God, after the rest of us ran them out of it and repulsed an unsuccessful Jewish assault on the US banking system in the 1920′s. Read Henry Ford for the details of this Jewish attack, which was only repulsed by racial solidarity of the non-Jewish bankers. At the moment, world banking is pretty much nonracial.

US Jews do play a *central* role in the US stock market, but to say they are dominant or controlling is false. However, US Jews are dominant in a few other fields, including retail sales, precious jewels, esp the diamond trade and furs. There may be a few others.

It is well-known that Jews dominate both the US media and Hollywood. I hung out in Hollywood for years and everyone who works there knows this, in fact, people casually remark on it all the time. Want to get an acting role? Pretend to be Jewish! Wear a star of David on your neck. ;)

The Jews who dominate the US media will not let most Jewish-critical or Israeli-critical stories see the light of day. Listen kiddo, let me tell you how it works ok, from a guy who has been an editor in the US media. As a young reporter, you may try to file and Israeli-critical or Jewish-critical story. Once. You will be called into the editors’ office, and he will let you know that you are NOT to write this type of story anymore. You WILL get the hint. If not, you WILL be fired. Got it?

No matter how big a story Mossad-9-11 may be, the powers that be in the media will never let it see the light of day. Tribal loyalty of the media Jews trumps their massive greed any day of the week.

CBS did not get any kind of document thing wrong, they were played by White House conartists and fell for a diabolical con. Karl Rove planted a fake document with CBS in an effort to destroy CBS and Dan Rather. If the media were punished for being wrong, all the US news channels and every paper would have been shut down years ago because they’re all wrong constantly.

The big media is massively unfair, all the time, and the rest of the media is terrified to call them on it, because of “examples” like what the rightwing lynch mob did to Dan Rather. Read Chomsky. We have a *controlled* media in the US, not too dissimilar to Sabbah’s Jordan!

Re: 9-11 and Mossad, go dig up the Fox News Report. It’s all over the net, esp. at whatreallyhappened.com. It’s a real eye-opener. Of course, Fox killed the story a few weeks later and then tried to *permanently remove it* from their websites (GEE why did they do THAT I wonder?) but many copied it.

Mossad is one of the dirtiest, snakiest, evillest, most lowdown, most wildcard agencies on the face of the Earth. They are brilliant and professional and capable of most anything. They have deliberately attacked US buildings and ships before, and they failed to warn us of the bombing of the Marine barracks in 1983, because they wanted the bombing to go down. Do not trust them!

C.B.:…The news media is huge. Saying the Jews control the media is like saying the Jews control the stock market..it is impossible.

Maybe you have missed this report: http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/01/19/who-rules-america/

Dan Marsden: Isn’t that the question…

Oh, so you don’t know either?

* Par-don me if I am a bit suspicious of neo-nazis!

* Hollywood and the newsmedia aren’t the same. The news media is huge. Saying the Jews control the media is like saying the Jews control the stock market..it is impossible. Nobody controls either one.

* Speaking of the stock market, the media works very much in the same way. The media’s primary concern is mooh-lah. Better stories = higher ratings = more mooh-lah. IF Israel were involved in 9/11, it would’ve been a HUGE story. The networks would’ve been falling all over each other to report it first.

* Since they are concerned with mooh-lah, the networks are in high competition with each other. Being wrong = less credibility = less ratings = less mooh-lah. Remember when CBS got that document thing wrong? The others would not shut up about it for many weeks. It is a business where you can not afford to be wrong. You can’t afford to be unfair, because the others will call you on it.

* After 9/11 I was glued to CNN. I heard the Mossad idea tossed around, talked about…and rejected. It did not hold up. As I said, if there were any amount of truth to it, the media would’ve been all over it…but no.

* It would not have made any sense for the Mossad to do such a thing, to fail to prevent 9/11. If the Mossad had prevented 9/11, they would’ve come out looking like total heroes.

A new master piece article by Wendy Campbell, Mark Green. Wendy and Mark are documentary filmmakers from Southern California. Their documentary films can be found at the website of their company, Marwen Media. Robert Lindsay (An Independent Left Journ…

Anyway, regarding Israel and 9-11, IMO, the best evidence indicates that US law enforcement, including the FBI, have reason to believe that the Israeli Mossad may have known about the plot beforehand and done nothing about it. They may have more involvement than that, but that’s not proven yet.

Re: Tigerhawk’s comments, as I noted on my blog, the Jewish takeover of Hollywood was IMO the result of a conspiracy amongst a small number of Jews from Galicia 100 years ago. The conspiracy has been ongoing in a sense ever since, as Jews have increased and consolidated their control over MY film industry. To this day, they practice *major* discrimation against non-Jews in the industry and I am not happy about that one bit!

These Jews took over Hollywood for one reason, to advance the tribal interests of the Jews and to attack the enemies and rivals of the Jews. Also to accumulate a lot of money and power for the Jews. This is raw naked ethnic warfare, and we look down on this here in the USA. The Jews are one of the only groups here anymore that wages ethnic warfare on other groups and IMO, it’s *not cool*!

Jews in the USA need to be Americans first and Jews second, not the other way around. Re: Hollywood trying to defeat Bush, I have mixed feelings about Hollywood Jews, since I hung out in Hollywood for years. They are very liberal people so I like them in many ways. Basically, Hollywood Jews are liberals first, and Jews second. On my blog in my notes about this piece, I note that the Hollywood Jew is not your average Jew. They are very secular, highly irrerevent, very liberal, mostly male, hedonistic and rather assimilated. Anyway, Kerry was pro-Israel too.

Jewish political power IS behind US support for Israel, to a large degree, though there are other factors. This is the dirty little secret of US politics and I assure you that 100% of the people on the Hill learn this fact very quickly. You are free to deny the obvious all you wish.

America began supporting Israel after JFK’s assassination, which is one reason why some suspect Mossad was involved in the killing. It dates back to JFK, 1964. After 1967 War, support for Israel exploded as the Israeli-Jewish Lobby finally got started in the US, and Jews started to support Israel a lot more. It just jelled after that. Kissinger came in and really turned US policy radically towards Israel, especially after 73 War. You know the story ever since.

Most Americans do not know that “Palestinians supported US enemies in various wars” and I suspect many do not care either. Palestinians do not have need for US support and won’t get it anytime soon anyway. But Israel has been a total disaster for the US, IMO. Due to Israel, we are in Iraq, we have suffered many attacks and terrorist attacks. It’s just senseless. The notion that Israel is no more oppressive or separatist than its Arab neighbors is a very difficult case to make. The separatist bit is false on its face. Israel is much more separatist than most Arab nations.

And Bush is incompetent only with 9/11? Hello? It was the entire American policy in the Middle East that was blowing up in their face (if it was indeed the doing of Bin Laden & co.). Bush’s incompetence??! 9/11 was NOT about domestic unrest….

“What does Israel have to do with 9/11?”

Isn’t that the question… :)

“Nothing, I’d say, unless the neo-nazis who dumped hate lit on my lawn are right?”

What? So the “Israelis” or Jews for that matter can never be behind any wrongdoings because that would mean that the neo-Nazis are right?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?! What kind of logic is that? Or are you just being sarcastic? Boy, I sure hope you are!

Denial is not an answer to hundreds of articles, books, TV reports, etc… about Zionist involvement in 9/11.

Simply calling the guys behind publishing these facts a neo-nazis or evil himself does not make me feel sympathy for Israel!

Admit it, “Israel” has been the most irresponsible slave of the big powers to have ever graced history. That they have acquired so much power (especially nuclear) might be good for them (although I have my doubts about that in the long run), but it most certainly has not been good for their allies and protectors USA. To cut a long story short, the winds of change might blow in any direction at any given time. In fact, “it will be much worse before it gets any better” is what I am thinking of.

And you are wrong on 1967. The Arabs allied themselves with the Soviet Union only after the Suez war and the Israeli alliance with the Western powers Britain and France. In fact, America had been supportive of Israel even before that. After the Suez war, when Israel, Britain, and France conspired to and successfully occupied the Sinai until the Suez canal, USA did not do much about it, and the Soviets had to issue a strict warning to “Israel” which resulted in their withdrawal in lightning speed. So now you see that the Arabs never really expressed much of a priority as to who came to their defense. The big powers decided it for themselves, and the smaller powers (at the time small, when it comes to “Israel”) could do nothing but await their weapons sales / offers. The dynamics have changed now, but it wasn’t so back in the 50s and 60s.

Moreover, Nasser was not by any means anti-”Israel”. It was not as simple as that. He was, until the Suez campaign very much ready to (and indeed did) sit for talks with “Israel”. “Israel”, however, proved time and again that it was more willing to occupy more and more and more land (including the DMZ) than having the peace with Arabs that it supposedly yearned for. Nasser’s stance changed very suddenly, but it was only after the “Israeli” military campaign. In fact, Nasser was very smart indeed and knew that such a thing was going to happen again, and much worse, with a diplomatically stronger “Israel” and a lower possibility that the same withdrawal would take place as it happened after the Suez war.

And before you accuse the Muftis of befriending Hitler, you must first look at the more embarassing facts – zionists befriended Hitler and indeed endorsed his campaign long before any Mufti or Arab leader did. If we’re going to play this blame game, zionists would come out much worse, I can assure you.

As for “why should any American voter support any policy that benefits them?”, I will ask the same question, “why should any American voter support any policcy that benefits those who 1) attacked their ships in international waters and later on lied and claimed that it was by mistake [same old lies] 2) use their tax dollars to murder innocent human beings 3) cause the spread of “terrorism” (are you also going to argue that if USA supported Arab countries and attacked “Israel” like it attacked Iraq, Arabs would be against USA let alone attack it?)

TigerHawk claims here that: “…America did not support Israel to any meaningful degree until 1967. It did so in that war because the key Arab powers allied themselves with the Soviet Union, the enemy of the United States.”
Of course …