Comments on: UN Fails to define Terrorism http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/ Because Silence is Complicity! Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Global Voices Online http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-89178 Global Voices Online Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:08:17 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-89178 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] to the sidelines of reported news?” Sabbah of Sabbah’s Blog has a post on the failure of the UN to set a global definition of “terrorism“. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] to the sidelines of reported news?” Sabbah of Sabbah’s Blog has a post on the failure of the UN to set a global definition of “terrorism“. [...]

]]> By: Haitham http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16433 Haitham Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:56:23 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16433 infidelia, Your hate comments do not belong to my blog. I don't have to explain a lot, but of course as you said, truth can't be hidden. Therefore, I encourage you to create your own blog and reply to my posts on your blog. Bottom line, this blog is not an open forum for your hate messages. infidelia,

Your hate comments do not belong to my blog. I don’t have to explain a lot, but of course as you said, truth can’t be hidden.

Therefore, I encourage you to create your own blog and reply to my posts on your blog.

Bottom line, this blog is not an open forum for your hate messages.

]]> By: Infidelia http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16432 Infidelia Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:41:19 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16432 Nice of you to remove my posts. - How typically Islamic. When one tells the truth about Muslims and Islam—with quotes from the Qur'an and the ahadeeth, the ummah simply tries to remove the evidence. - No matter where you burry the truth—it will still STINK! You can't hide the fact that it is Muslims murdering Muslims in the name of Islam the world over. Muhammad fought bloody battles to impose an imperialistic, islamic hegemony on the world for over 20 years—just as the Qur'an commands. His followers have done the same for over 1400 years. - You can run, but you can't hide from the truth that Islam is NOT a religion of peace and equality. [...] <strong>Remaining part of this comment, and other comments sent earlier by Infidelia, but was not published are now deleted by me - Haitham.</strong> Nice of you to remove my posts.
-
How typically Islamic. When one tells the truth about Muslims and Islam—with quotes from the Qur’an and the ahadeeth, the ummah simply tries to remove the evidence.
-
No matter where you burry the truth—it will still STINK! You can’t hide the fact that it is Muslims murdering Muslims in the name of Islam the world over. Muhammad fought bloody battles to impose an imperialistic, islamic hegemony on the world for over 20 years—just as the Qur’an commands. His followers have done the same for over 1400 years.
-
You can run, but you can’t hide from the truth that Islam is NOT a religion of peace and equality.

[...]
Remaining part of this comment, and other comments sent earlier by Infidelia, but was not published are now deleted by me – Haitham.

]]> By: almuhanad http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16420 almuhanad Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:55:37 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16420 As long as definition of terrorism takes place within UN building in Newyork under the influence of the US Goverment and other permanent Security Council members, there will be no just definition. As long as there is occupation of Palestinian terrorities by Israel and Iraqi land by American and British forces, as long as a Jewish baby who will be born tomorrow in America has the right to immigrate to Palestine while a Palestinian born in a refugee camp is denied that right, as long as there is greed by Industrial nations in stealing the natural resources of poor nations, as long as minotities are denied cultural and historical rights and self determination within their own countries, as long as all these problems remain unsolved we have to expect so called terrorism to continue and flourish. As long as definition of terrorism takes place within UN building in Newyork under the influence of the US Goverment and other permanent Security Council members, there will be no just definition. As long as there is occupation of Palestinian terrorities by Israel and Iraqi land by American and British forces, as long as a Jewish baby who will be born tomorrow in America has the right to immigrate to Palestine while a Palestinian born in a refugee camp is denied that right, as long as there is greed by Industrial nations in stealing the natural resources of poor nations, as long as minotities are denied cultural and historical rights and self determination within their own countries, as long as all these problems remain unsolved we have to expect so called terrorism to continue and flourish.

]]> By: Global Voices Online http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16416 Global Voices Online Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:02:16 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16416 <strong>From the Jordanian Blogosphere</strong> On International Affairs: With the Israeli withdrawal, there is a lot to say in the Jordanian blogosphere about Palestine, both in relation to the withdrawal and otherwise. Biesan describes the withdrawal as “a historic day for the Palestinian p... From the Jordanian Blogosphere

On International Affairs:
With the Israeli withdrawal, there is a lot to say in the Jordanian blogosphere about Palestine, both in relation to the withdrawal and otherwise. Biesan describes the withdrawal as “a historic day for the Palestinian p…

]]> By: Inquisitor http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16269 Inquisitor Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:13:56 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16269 "Because one mans freedom fighting is always viewed as another mans terrorism, and that is a fact that is never going to ever change." yes, except in this age, the dividing line is drawn by those who believe that the nation-state is the sine qua non of existence. In other words, to engage in 'self-defense', one first has to have a 'national' self. Where this prerequisite is not satisfied, one is stripped of a self, and, by implication, stripped off the right to self-defence. All aggressive actions are thus construed from this point on as 'terrorism'. “Because one mans freedom fighting is always viewed as another mans terrorism, and that is a fact that is never going to ever change.”

yes, except in this age, the dividing line is drawn by those who believe that the nation-state is the sine qua non of existence. In other words, to engage in ‘self-defense’, one first has to have a ‘national’ self. Where this prerequisite is not satisfied, one is stripped of a self, and, by implication, stripped off the right to self-defence. All aggressive actions are thus construed from this point on as ‘terrorism’.

]]> By: Abu Sinan http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-16034 Abu Sinan Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:55:25 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-16034 Yeah, I think this is a waste of time. I think the way that most of the rest of the world would define terrorism would not be acceptable to at least one member of the Security Council, the US, if not more. Yeah, I think this is a waste of time. I think the way that most of the rest of the world would define terrorism would not be acceptable to at least one member of the Security Council, the US, if not more.

]]> By: hatem abunimeh http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/09/14/un-fails-to-define-terrorism/#comment-15640 hatem abunimeh Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:41:54 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=836#comment-15640 There is no way that they will ever find a clear cut definition other that the one we all know and found in the dictionary. Why ? Because one mans freedom fighting is always viewed as another mans terrorism, and that is a fact that is never going to ever change. One can provide all the justificatin he wants for his actions, but that isn't going to convince the other man from describing these actions as acts of terrorism. It is sad but true. There is no way that they will ever find a clear cut definition other that the one we all know and found in the dictionary. Why ?

Because one mans freedom fighting is always viewed as another mans terrorism, and that is a fact that is never going to ever change. One can provide all the justificatin he wants for his actions, but that isn’t going to convince the other man from describing these actions as acts of terrorism. It is sad but true.

]]>