<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dress Code and HR Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/</link>
	<description>Because Silence is Complicity!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-89138</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-89138</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] ; Dagdegni, by Reef Fakhouri, George Akra, and Karim Arafat.&#160;&#160; Tololy and Sabbah argue the different facets of implementing a dress code in offices, while [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] ; Dagdegni, by Reef Fakhouri, George Akra, and Karim Arafat.&nbsp;&nbsp; Tololy and Sabbah argue the different facets of implementing a dress code in offices, while [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-33902</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-33902</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;From the Jordanian Blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt;

	Jordan: A New Government in the Making
The newly appointed Prime Minster has been announced, being Marouf Bakhit. Naseem Tarawneh thinks that this might help the path to reform. Khalaf says about the newly appointed PM, &#8220;Being self made, one wou...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From the Jordanian Blogosphere</strong></p>
<p>	Jordan: A New Government in the Making<br />
The newly appointed Prime Minster has been announced, being Marouf Bakhit. Naseem Tarawneh thinks that this might help the path to reform. Khalaf says about the newly appointed PM, &#8220;Being self made, one wou&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basem</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32987</link>
		<dc:creator>Basem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32987</guid>
		<description>Good article Sabbah, at the risk of being viewed as blunt in essence, yet anything related to the notion of adapting any sort of &quot;corporate&quot; culture in Jordan -while we lack corperate foundation-  aggregates me fiercely!

Companies in Jordan can loosely be segregated into three categories: 

The legacy ones that have been in business for years and their just fine with how they go about their dailies, 

The new-bread of companies (along with the traditionalists who opted for a makeover) with hyped &quot;corporate&quot; job titles, weekly problematic interdepartmental email frenzies and unprofessional bilingual corporate talk, and finally 

The medium sized companies with the dilemma between going for the orthodox methods, or adapting the expensive hyped new-age “corporate” image. Of course there are the small companies that are basically too small to have any sort of issues. 

Despite the fact that traditional companies have many deficiencies, but all similarly-natured problems -dress-code that is- thrive at the second category, where most employees are not in dire need for the work in hand, or at least they hardly view their work as part of their -or their immediate family- welfare regardless of the individual’s dedication &amp; productivity at the company, especially if it was a high-profile telecom, IT or a multinational, where pride for working for such company spoils the motto of the junior staff focus on his/her career.  

For all that it is worth, if we are bound to discuss &quot;corporate&quot; dress-code, then the matter will only bite back on the winging work force of such companies, for they have turned their companies -with the surprising consent of its management- to a mere social club where designer clothing -bought by the eagerly earned payrolls- are worn daily for the sole purpose of being seen, this also extends to the excessive morning makeup and inappropriate night-out hair styling that goes totally unnoticed, yet in a strange contrast… if one happens to sport a fist-long beard, then this is alarmingly not fit for the professional &quot;corporate&quot; image the company is trying to reflect! 

Methinks in such companies, a casual dress-code policy is disruptive to it’s daily proceedings despite how soothing it is to the overall ora of the work-place, if I was the HR manager at my previous work in Jordan, I would have made it compulsory to wear a uniformed dark suit (for both genders) perhaps with their employee numbers painted to the back of the suit and engraved to their foreheads. 

Having said that, I feel that billboard-sized cursor pointing at my direction with the script &quot;hypocrite&quot; highlighted next to it, as just yesterday I was hassling my new manager (I just shifted from engineering to marketing department) to exclude me from his formal suit policy in his department… 

But I surely do think that –and support- crude and strict HR policies that are required to discipline the general work force in Jordan and limit the possibility of abuse and wastefulness, Yet reformation is taking place, then more fundamental and intrinsic issues must be addressed first, such as true HR development and training, berocracy-free organizational hierarchy, erudite &amp; functional company structuring and perhaps adaptation of a save-the-planet paper-free flow throughout the company.

And Sabbah... if you&#039;re talking about the funny yellow-cum-green-branded company, then 30% is the share that shareholders would like to petty themselves with, reality speaks of a different ridicule penetration rate! Talk about dual users,  low ARPU, high churn &amp; after hours peak usage instead…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Sabbah, at the risk of being viewed as blunt in essence, yet anything related to the notion of adapting any sort of &#8220;corporate&#8221; culture in Jordan -while we lack corperate foundation-  aggregates me fiercely!</p>
<p>Companies in Jordan can loosely be segregated into three categories: </p>
<p>The legacy ones that have been in business for years and their just fine with how they go about their dailies, </p>
<p>The new-bread of companies (along with the traditionalists who opted for a makeover) with hyped &#8220;corporate&#8221; job titles, weekly problematic interdepartmental email frenzies and unprofessional bilingual corporate talk, and finally </p>
<p>The medium sized companies with the dilemma between going for the orthodox methods, or adapting the expensive hyped new-age “corporate” image. Of course there are the small companies that are basically too small to have any sort of issues. </p>
<p>Despite the fact that traditional companies have many deficiencies, but all similarly-natured problems -dress-code that is- thrive at the second category, where most employees are not in dire need for the work in hand, or at least they hardly view their work as part of their -or their immediate family- welfare regardless of the individual’s dedication &amp; productivity at the company, especially if it was a high-profile telecom, IT or a multinational, where pride for working for such company spoils the motto of the junior staff focus on his/her career.  </p>
<p>For all that it is worth, if we are bound to discuss &#8220;corporate&#8221; dress-code, then the matter will only bite back on the winging work force of such companies, for they have turned their companies -with the surprising consent of its management- to a mere social club where designer clothing -bought by the eagerly earned payrolls- are worn daily for the sole purpose of being seen, this also extends to the excessive morning makeup and inappropriate night-out hair styling that goes totally unnoticed, yet in a strange contrast… if one happens to sport a fist-long beard, then this is alarmingly not fit for the professional &#8220;corporate&#8221; image the company is trying to reflect! </p>
<p>Methinks in such companies, a casual dress-code policy is disruptive to it’s daily proceedings despite how soothing it is to the overall ora of the work-place, if I was the HR manager at my previous work in Jordan, I would have made it compulsory to wear a uniformed dark suit (for both genders) perhaps with their employee numbers painted to the back of the suit and engraved to their foreheads. </p>
<p>Having said that, I feel that billboard-sized cursor pointing at my direction with the script &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; highlighted next to it, as just yesterday I was hassling my new manager (I just shifted from engineering to marketing department) to exclude me from his formal suit policy in his department… </p>
<p>But I surely do think that –and support- crude and strict HR policies that are required to discipline the general work force in Jordan and limit the possibility of abuse and wastefulness, Yet reformation is taking place, then more fundamental and intrinsic issues must be addressed first, such as true HR development and training, berocracy-free organizational hierarchy, erudite &amp; functional company structuring and perhaps adaptation of a save-the-planet paper-free flow throughout the company.</p>
<p>And Sabbah&#8230; if you&#8217;re talking about the funny yellow-cum-green-branded company, then 30% is the share that shareholders would like to petty themselves with, reality speaks of a different ridicule penetration rate! Talk about dual users,  low ARPU, high churn &amp; after hours peak usage instead…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Arrabi</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32920</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Arrabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32920</guid>
		<description>Nice article, and I highly agree wiht this:
&lt;i&gt;It is difficult to find a strong argument in favor of non-client-contact personnel being forced to wear formal business attire. &lt;/i&gt;

Free &amp; casual dress code is very useful for r&amp;d environments and where creativity is important.

and I also applaud you for making sure to explain HR policies to the employees. I wish our governments become transparent and explain much of the process &amp; laws they come up with.

By the way, is the company where you currently where in Jordan? or is it in UAE? I&#039;m very glad to know that there are such open-minded companies in the Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, and I highly agree wiht this:<br />
<i>It is difficult to find a strong argument in favor of non-client-contact personnel being forced to wear formal business attire. </i></p>
<p>Free &amp; casual dress code is very useful for r&amp;d environments and where creativity is important.</p>
<p>and I also applaud you for making sure to explain HR policies to the employees. I wish our governments become transparent and explain much of the process &amp; laws they come up with.</p>
<p>By the way, is the company where you currently where in Jordan? or is it in UAE? I&#8217;m very glad to know that there are such open-minded companies in the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatem abunimeh</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32918</link>
		<dc:creator>hatem abunimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32918</guid>
		<description>Tololy,
 
Human being is naturally rebellious, we rebel against our parent, against our school teachers, and against the state strict rules and regulation, heck, we even rebel against the posted speed limit.
 
When our employers stipulate that we must comply with a dress code, we come up with myriad of reasons as to why dressing casually is much more productive, much more efficient than being in a uniform.
 
It may or may not be the case, I don&#039;t pretend to know the reasons why the employer requires their employees to dress formally, to comply with a dress code, or even be in a formal standard uniform.
 
I think that [standardization] might be one reason, [advertising] might be another, [distinction], [recognition], look at the the gas man, the light man, the post man, the police man,  and the delivery man.
 
If we don&#039;t recognize them by the way they dress we probably wouldn&#039;t open the door for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tololy,</p>
<p>Human being is naturally rebellious, we rebel against our parent, against our school teachers, and against the state strict rules and regulation, heck, we even rebel against the posted speed limit.</p>
<p>When our employers stipulate that we must comply with a dress code, we come up with myriad of reasons as to why dressing casually is much more productive, much more efficient than being in a uniform.</p>
<p>It may or may not be the case, I don&#8217;t pretend to know the reasons why the employer requires their employees to dress formally, to comply with a dress code, or even be in a formal standard uniform.</p>
<p>I think that [standardization] might be one reason, [advertising] might be another, [distinction], [recognition], look at the the gas man, the light man, the post man, the police man,  and the delivery man.</p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t recognize them by the way they dress we probably wouldn&#8217;t open the door for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tololy</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tololy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32917</guid>
		<description>As always, I am glad to be someone&#039;s muse. To repeat what I have clearly stated in my entry concerning this particular topic back at Tololy&#039;s Box, I fail to understand the reason behind my having to wear formal clothes to a job in which I meet with words through a computer screen. I have little or no interaction with individuals, and this makes the situation all the more absurd. 

Not wanting to reiterate what I said, I think I hail the second view, discussed in this entry, and for obvious reasons. I think many firms come short of understanding the needs of their employees and hence comes failure in many other aspects of the business as a whole. 

To make things sound less drammatic, a blog entry, such as the one featured in Tololy&#039;s Box, showing complete discontent with the establishment&#039;s &quot;upstairs folks&quot; descision is merely a simple indication of how employees feel and think when subject to such arbitrary codes. Some may argue that this does not harm the firm&#039;s image per se, I could agree with that, but it does make one reflect upon the policies in action in that specific firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, I am glad to be someone&#8217;s muse. To repeat what I have clearly stated in my entry concerning this particular topic back at Tololy&#8217;s Box, I fail to understand the reason behind my having to wear formal clothes to a job in which I meet with words through a computer screen. I have little or no interaction with individuals, and this makes the situation all the more absurd. </p>
<p>Not wanting to reiterate what I said, I think I hail the second view, discussed in this entry, and for obvious reasons. I think many firms come short of understanding the needs of their employees and hence comes failure in many other aspects of the business as a whole. </p>
<p>To make things sound less drammatic, a blog entry, such as the one featured in Tololy&#8217;s Box, showing complete discontent with the establishment&#8217;s &#8220;upstairs folks&#8221; descision is merely a simple indication of how employees feel and think when subject to such arbitrary codes. Some may argue that this does not harm the firm&#8217;s image per se, I could agree with that, but it does make one reflect upon the policies in action in that specific firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatem abunimeh</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32916</link>
		<dc:creator>hatem abunimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32916</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that there is a relationship between the uniform requirements on one hand and the human resources on the other, they are two separate and distinct subjects. Take the army for instance it is the biggest employer in every country around the world with the exception to very few countries that don&#039;t have an army. Almost all of the army personnel are required to wear a uniform, and their uniform policy is the most strict one, yet, there is no human resources departments that belong to the army. Army recruiters are specialized army officers and not human resources officers. The army doesn&#039;t have an open door policy where you can walk in on any one in any rank at any time without speaking first with some one of a lower rank. Notwithstanding, the army is usually classified as any efficiently run corporation. I&#039;m not in favor of an open door policy, more often than not, the person with highest rank isn&#039;t usually familiar with the details of the issues when someone of a low rank come and complain to him, in almost all cases, he will not have a readily available answer and he had to go back to his subordinate to find out what the problem is. Finally, uniforms are very expensive, not just in cost but also in maintaining them especially if the company has large number of employees. I think that most employers abandoned the idea of putting their workers in uniform because they realized that they can save a lot of money by letting their workers dress casually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is a relationship between the uniform requirements on one hand and the human resources on the other, they are two separate and distinct subjects. Take the army for instance it is the biggest employer in every country around the world with the exception to very few countries that don&#8217;t have an army. Almost all of the army personnel are required to wear a uniform, and their uniform policy is the most strict one, yet, there is no human resources departments that belong to the army. Army recruiters are specialized army officers and not human resources officers. The army doesn&#8217;t have an open door policy where you can walk in on any one in any rank at any time without speaking first with some one of a lower rank. Notwithstanding, the army is usually classified as any efficiently run corporation. I&#8217;m not in favor of an open door policy, more often than not, the person with highest rank isn&#8217;t usually familiar with the details of the issues when someone of a low rank come and complain to him, in almost all cases, he will not have a readily available answer and he had to go back to his subordinate to find out what the problem is. Finally, uniforms are very expensive, not just in cost but also in maintaining them especially if the company has large number of employees. I think that most employers abandoned the idea of putting their workers in uniform because they realized that they can save a lot of money by letting their workers dress casually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatem abunimeh</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/11/21/dress-code-and-hr-development/#comment-32915</link>
		<dc:creator>hatem abunimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1033#comment-32915</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that there is a relationship between the uniform requirements on one hand and the human resources on the other, they are two separate and distinct subjects. Take the army for instance it is the biggest employer in every country around the world with the exception to very few countries that don&#039;t have an army. Almost all of the army personnel are required to wear a uniform, and their uniform policy is the most strict one, yet, there is no human resources departments that belong to the army. Army recruiters are specialized army officers and not human resources officers. The army doesn&#039;t have an open door policy where you can walk in on any one in any rank at any time without speaking first with some one of a lower rank. Notwithstanding, the army is usually classified as any efficiently run corporation. I&#039;m not in favor of an open door policy, more often than not, the person with highest rank isn&#039;t usually familiar with the details of the issues when someone of a low rank come and complain to him, in almost all cases, he will not have a readily available answer and he had to go back to his subordinate to find out what the problem is. Finally, uniforms are very expensive, not just in cost but also in maintaining them especially if the company has large number of employees. I think that most employers abandoned the idea of putting their workers in uniform because they realized that they can save a lot of money by letting their workers dress casually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is a relationship between the uniform requirements on one hand and the human resources on the other, they are two separate and distinct subjects. Take the army for instance it is the biggest employer in every country around the world with the exception to very few countries that don&#8217;t have an army. Almost all of the army personnel are required to wear a uniform, and their uniform policy is the most strict one, yet, there is no human resources departments that belong to the army. Army recruiters are specialized army officers and not human resources officers. The army doesn&#8217;t have an open door policy where you can walk in on any one in any rank at any time without speaking first with some one of a lower rank. Notwithstanding, the army is usually classified as any efficiently run corporation. I&#8217;m not in favor of an open door policy, more often than not, the person with highest rank isn&#8217;t usually familiar with the details of the issues when someone of a low rank come and complain to him, in almost all cases, he will not have a readily available answer and he had to go back to his subordinate to find out what the problem is. Finally, uniforms are very expensive, not just in cost but also in maintaining them especially if the company has large number of employees. I think that most employers abandoned the idea of putting their workers in uniform because they realized that they can save a lot of money by letting their workers dress casually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

