Comments on: King David Palace? http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/12/05/king-david-palace/ Because Silence is Complicity! Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Joyce Sellshttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/12/05/king-david-palace/#comment-341674 Joyce Sells Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:38:52 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1076#comment-341674 I don't know when the Romans distroyed Jerusalem, but King David lived from 1085 B.C to 1015 B.C. 70 A.D. is about 54 generations later. I don’t know when the Romans distroyed Jerusalem, but King David lived from 1085 B.C to 1015 B.C. 70 A.D. is about 54 generations later.

]]> By: bdbdhttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/12/05/king-david-palace/#comment-35453 bdbd Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:00:39 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1076#comment-35453 This may help you: 1) The temple Romans destroyed in 70 A.D. has nothing to do with David. 2) Romans did not completely destroy Jerusalem in 70 A.D. This may help you:

1) The temple Romans destroyed in 70 A.D. has nothing to do with David.

2) Romans did not completely destroy Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

]]> By: Haithamhttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/12/05/king-david-palace/#comment-35331 Haitham Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:14:03 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1076#comment-35331 Well they might have left a stone here or there. That's enough reason to stay digging the old city ;-) Well they might have left a stone here or there. That’s enough reason to stay digging the old city ;-)

]]> By: Hareegahttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/12/05/king-david-palace/#comment-35320 Hareega Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:31:36 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=1076#comment-35320 In 70 A.D., the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem, completely and totally and left nothing behind. Any temple would have been destroyed, STOP LYING TO PEOPLE!!! In 70 A.D., the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem, completely and totally and left nothing behind. Any temple would have been destroyed, STOP LYING TO PEOPLE!!!

]]>