Hoder Fatwa?! (a.k.a. My Zionist Friend)

If you want to be notified the next time I write something, sign up for FREE email alerts or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

It’s not going to be long before we hear another fatwa, well; we never fall short of them, did we?

This time, I’m sure it will be titled; “Kill Hoder The Kafer”. But who is Hoder, and why this fatwa?

Hoder is an Iranian blogger (based in Canada) which I meet in London during last GVO meeting. He is also a member of our Global Voices - Middle East & North Africa team. He is a very well known peace activist, especially when it comes to issues related to Iran. Yet, he is not one that American regime likes.

He is planning to make his first visit to Israel today. A visit which he describes as breaking a major taboo.

This might mean that I won’t be able to go back to Iran for a long time, since Iran doesn’t recognize Israel, has no diplomatic relations with it, and apparently considers traveling there illegal. Too bad, but I don’t care. Fortunately, I’m a citizen of Canada and I have the right to visit any country I want.

Big bang! In the few coming days, the media will go crazy about covering this story, positively and negatively. But one can guess how Iran will react. Mullah’s will not miss the chance for a new round of fatwa’s, and you can guess what it will carry.


Meanwhile, the gray media will make its best to show the world that Iran is evil, in spite that Hoder is Iranian, and his mission is as Iranian blogger/activist, not as Canadian or something else, keep that in mind.

Well, I don’t envy Hoder now (but I envy him for being with Lisa), although I really wish to make a visit to Israel, but I would prefer to go through the checkpoints of the Occupied Territories rather than going through cozy gates of Ben Gurion airport… Why? Because if peace has to take a chance, we have to remove the barriers, not jump over them!

Also, before the media goes mad about this, we have to keep in mind that; although Israel, the West and many parts of the world (including me as part of this world), do not like the Iranian regime, but this administration was elected by the majority of its people. Democracy! Heard that? Majority of its people!

I’m not going to claim to be an expert in Iranian issues, but we can criticize the mistakes of a regime, we can call them all what we think they are based on the media and NGO’s reports that leak from here and there, but at the end of the day, the Iranian crowed supports that administration, with all its faults. While Hoder represent? Of course the peaceful wing, tolerant side of the Iranian community. After all, he is in a peaceful mission.

But does this count? I’m afraid that soon the media will bury Hoder story and focus back on Iran nuclear program. Not that the nuclear program of Iran is not a threat to the region, but is it the only one/threat?

I’m just being realistic, and wishing Hoder all the best in his trip, and hoping not to hear anything from the mouths of the Mullahs.

Enjoy this post? Get future updates sent to you for free! Join by email or RSS.
Tagged with: [ , , , , ]
Bookmark it
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Pownce
  • Propeller
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Fark
  • Live
  • TwitThis
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

One Comment on “Hoder Fatwa?! (a.k.a. My Zionist Friend)”

  • deteodoru
    11 May, 2006, 8:03

    Below is an impression I would love to share,
    particularly with Jewish members on this list. It is a
    most disturbing impression that can only be
    ameliorated through collegial discourse, in my view.
    So I offer it to this list in hope of promoting
    discussion instead of slander. Reason can change my
    views as they are fraught with alarm that would
    appreciation pacification.

    The “Big Red Scare” days of the Cold War were heady
    days, especially for the once Leninist neocons turned
    anti-Red propagandists publishing in CIA sponsored
    media directed at the Left. But those days are gone
    and many rich careers made in the Conservative
    Movement fighting the “Red Menace” came to a crashing
    end. Trade names for think-tanks, publications,
    publishing houses and other assets could be bought for
    a nickle on the dollar as the Corporate Establishment
    and CIA ceased funding of the “Red Scare” propaganda
    machine and the well payed “experts” had to scramble
    in search of real jobs.

    Many proved to be as good at scholarship and writing
    as at their past trade of scare propaganda and they
    found a niche for themselves in academia. But for the
    neocons it proved business as usual, for they were
    able to move from the “Big Red Scare” to the “Big
    Green Scare.” Green is the color of Islam and the
    neocons managed to parley venture capital from
    right-wing Zionist extremist entrepreneurs into a “War
    on Terror” fighting the new Islam scare. Indeed,
    deeming the Cold War “World War III,” they declared
    “World War IV” on Islam:
    http://www.commentarymagazine.com/podhoretz.htm

    To be sure, the internationally waged Zionist campaign
    to label all Islamists “Jihadists” is not new. In its
    desperate effort to impede global recognition of the
    Palestinians as a people with national aspirations,
    the Israeli Government funded lavishly with American
    aid-funds all sorts of front organizations that
    depicted every act of terror a tactical battle in the
    GLOBAL Islamist War on the West. Recently, Israeli
    operative Bernard Lewis was honored on his 90th
    birthday as the first to warn of a new war of the
    worlds– to the death– between Islam and Christianity
    which they say he dubbed, a Clash of Civilizations,
    not Huntington, the author of a book by the same name.
    Nowhere was his past personal history as agent of an
    interested party ever mentioned, after all, a basic
    tenet of this operation is the “Don’t show, don’t
    tell” inability on the part of us “dumb goyim”
    Christians to recognize the bias behind his
    “scholarship.”

    To be sure, the neocons would be quick to point out,
    9/11 has more than signaled the existence of such a
    “clash of civilizations.”– but with ALL of Islam?
    Here again, as in their past Cold War propaganda, the
    neocons relied on their true and tried tactic of
    “don’t show, don’t tell,” for we are deemed “dumb
    goyim” who will not look behind the blaring slogans.
    The fact is that we, the Christian World, came to
    Islam to conquer it after it had collapsed as a power,
    not the other way around. And, armed by Stalin,
    European Jews created out of nothing the state of
    Israel. Instead of making the Germans pay for the
    Holocaust, we, in fact, made the Arabs pay and pay
    dearly; the most helpless Palestinians, according to
    Benny Morris, the Zionist historian, suffered a cruel
    invasion that caused some more idealistic Israelis to
    name it “Zionazi” for its exterminationist tactics of
    ethnic cleansing. That 1948 event is, right or wrong,
    at the root
    of 9/11, as well as our imperial protection of our
    “cheap oil” through corrupt regimes we back and
    protect against their own subjects.

    Through parthenogenesis (eg. self-replication) a
    plethora of organization was created by a hand full of
    neocons, much as they did as one time Leninists, to
    give the impression of a heterogeneous “united front”
    of view points. For them, 9/11 was not as much of a
    God-sent as was the coalition they managed to make
    with the Fundamentalist Christians who believe that
    the Day of Rapture will only come AFTER Israel comes
    to dominate the Middle East. Coalition with these
    “Christian Zionists” (though for reasons that can be
    considered nothing more than an extension of their
    anti-Semitic position) proved to be like a Stalinist
    Coup per the 1936 Dimitrov designed “united front”
    that, “neutralizes our enemies and brings them to the
    service of our cause.”

    Using the Cold War Era and the opportunist Senator
    Jackson of Washington State, who really thought the
    neocons would bring him to the presidency, (his hopes
    were dashed by a massive and fatal coronary) they
    campaigned for bigger is better strategic weapons and
    thus in an influence peddling scheme linked the
    massive American military-industrial complex– that
    Eisenhower was so weary of– with that of Israel.
    There was plenty of money to be made and, to date,
    none of the neocons nor their progeny suffers from
    poverty. But, the end of the Cold War seemed to put
    all that in jeopardy; that is, until 9/11 brought an
    end to the unachievable sure-fire ABM System and gave
    cause for a “transformation” of the US military into a
    global Christian Expeditionary Force chasing Jihadists
    all over the globe and promoting– they hoped–
    Israeli domination of the Middle East:

    But note, no sooner did we reach achievement of one
    such venture in our war on terror that we abandoned it
    unaccomplished for yet another. Hence, the masters of
    9/11/2001 are still alive and free, today mid-2006,
    still directing alQaeda in its terrorizing of the
    world. After all, there’s little to be gained from
    ending the source of the scare!

    In the meantime, the “Big Green Scare” propaganda is
    in full swing. For example, the same neocon Hudson
    Institute that championed more-is-better nuclear
    armaments for the war against the Big Red Scare is now
    promoting “expert and great scholar” on Islam Bat
    Yo’er, an Israeli who lives in Switzerland (like many
    neocons living in “anti-Semite” Europe instead of the
    “safe homeland” Israel), from where she propagates the
    concept of “EURABIA,” which means that Europe has
    already been taken by Islam because of its inherent
    weaknesses: (1) anti-Jewish nature and (2) loss of
    Christian zeal to destroy Islam. Now if that doesn’t
    sound like an obvious attempt to kill two birds with
    one stone, I don’t know what does. As Anne Norton
    notes in her book, ” Leo Strauss and the Politics of
    American Empire,” Yale university Press, there is an
    ongoing a full-court-press anti-Semitic campaign
    against Arabs and Islam in general, run by the
    neocons, which I would dub the “Big Green Scare.”

    This campaign has yet another motive: fear that as
    more and more Islamics settle and succeed in America,
    they will acquire the economic wherewithal to match
    the “Israel Lobby” that Mearsheimer and Walt wrote
    about in their study– but this AIPAC with “I” for
    “Islam” instead of “Israel”– one seeking to sway
    Congress, not on Israel’s behalf as does AIPAC, but on
    behalf of Islam. Such “dumb goyim” are deemed the
    Christian Americans in Congress, that the neocons fear
    that, once the Arabs acquire a foothold in American
    politics, they will draw Congress away from Israel.

    It is most instructive to read how the Neocon
    Establishment responded to the Mearsheimer and Walt
    analysis of the Israel Lobby and what is fomented by
    these neocons– or through their “friends”– about
    Islam in order to feed the Big Green Scare; it is
    utter ANTI-SEMITISM!!!

    Here is one sample of the way the case is made:
    part 1
    http://www.reportingwar.com/esman032006.shtml
    part 2
    http://www.reportingwar.com/esman041006.shtml

    and below is the URL for the Mearsheimer and Walt
    article that caused such a stir:
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html
    which was so vitriolically denounced by ADL as
    follows:
    http://www.adl.org/Israel/mearsheimer_walt.asp

    So, it would seem, Ye’or on “Eurabia” is O.K. but
    Mearsheimer and Walt on AIPAC is “anti-Semitic.” I
    leave you all to contemplate and further research
    what’s behind the BIG GREEN SCARE.

    Daniel E. Teodoru