Try to imagine them getting out of that slavery first and then try to imagine other things.

John

Try to imagine you are a handicapped, homosexual, Roma, practitioner of natural medicine,or a political dissident who have been publicly burnt, boiled, drowned, tortured, pursecuted, harassed, and alienated in your own society alongside Jews for centuries. Try to imagine that you have fought for tolerance and acceptance in order for all minorities to rightfully live in peace in the societies they are born.

Then try to imagine that 120 years ago a small group from one of the minorities who had suffered alongside you started a political organization which would marginalize your suffering as a means to promote their own political ends. Try also to imagine that this organization actively worked against you being tolerated and accepted in the society you were born simply because they saw themselves as so important that support for tolerance and acceptance of all minorities would be sacrifised -even sabotaged- for the purpose of promoting the political objectives of this organization which does not even represent everybody in their own group – your fellow minority!

It goes like this …
Get the argument away from the reality of the suffering,

Take the argument into a different “hypothetical” situation where there are “good guys” and “bad guys”, which are already designated by the person who is creating the “example” (eg “robber” = Palestinian, “decent, law abiding citizen” = Israeli).

Force you into making a decision in this hypothetical situation which plays entirely by their rules,

Say “AH! told you so! Now you know why we have to fight the “bad guys” if you answer “yes” to any of their questions!

In my humble opinion, the piece above is simply an attempt to play them at their own game. However, I feel that it won’t work as well in the US as the author intends it to, as the author is using his inverted logic to point his finger at the US (in it’s role reversal as “Iraq”), and many Americans prefer not to see their county’s behaviour mirrored in this way (whatever the truth is). Rather, they respond more to messages that point out some kind of “common cause” that they can indentify with, rather than having a finger pointed at them. Organisations like AIPAC understand this all too well. Personally, I do not believe that a constantly unfolding human tragedy should be reduced to silly hypothetical situations like this anyway!

I would also like to hail, our king abdullah, Saudi Arabian King and other monarch’s who are blindly in the belief that they are immune. Every generation has a war to fight and it is clearly seen the fall of the all these empires and western dominion is being imposed for centuries.

According to the Universal rights formulated and according to the freedom messiah “MR. BUSH & BLAIR” every nation and every individual has the right to defend its very existence. It is justified for all the nations to hold tools and technology to safegaurd their interests. Furthermore, if the nations and its leaders are not in a position to safegaurd the very interests of the civilians.

The bottom line it is your duty, to safe gaurd your people. The common man, should empower himself and shouldnt rely on the machinery that serves the interests of western nations.