Comments on: Tactical Nuclear Weapon Detonated In Iraq?

By: Robin

Robin — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:54:39 +0000

Thanks Kimmy, I was going to ignore “Steve” but you hit the nail on the head. I think he and the other foxies in the bush might be in a little bit of a pissy mood today after the Dear John letter sent by the American public yesterday. On Pelosi’s list of things to do, investigate fraud and mismanagement in Iraq and get us out. Leave it to a woman :) (just kidding)

By: kimmy

kimmy — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:15:44 +0000

Steve,
Biologically male?
Are you boilogically human?
If you follow the “polls” you will find out that the Fox network is loosing viewership in a hurry.
And please don’t include me under the term “gals”, that is so rude to me and Robin. She is a Lady.
If you really want to get into a gender discussion, I will let you know that I have more respect for the female gender than the male gender because they are more willing to listen to reason than a male. Also, they are more willing to accept another person’s view if they are proven wrong.
On top of that, they don’t have that inflated ego that most men have.
I thank my two daughters and my wife for these viewpoints.
Steve, if you were full of anymore bull you would have a horn protruding out your backside!

By: Rick

Rick — Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:42:14 +0000

http://www.tintdude.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/lofiversion/index.php/t11098.html

look at the date this forum released the video. The second video is not Camp Falcon

do a search of ammo_dump_attack_in_iraq.wmv find out yourself. These are two seperate events.

By: steve

steve — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:15:56 +0000

A) Kimmy is not a man. He is biologically male.

B) The reason this is not being covered has been previously stated,but to repeat:

“However, they are not all stupid and crazy, and they have been burned with false reports in the past,as Dan Rather (former newsman,now functionally unemployed ) will attest. This is a hoax. Arab media is not to be believed, due to lack of professionalism, poor training, lack of intelligence (also a US problem), no oversight by contrasting media to prove them wrong, and outrageous bias.”

C) Fox News is cable, and despite the fact that they dwarf all other cable news (is CNN still on the air?), free TV has far more viewers. Moreover, FOX has a sadly high number of libs. They are “fair and balanced”. ‘You just never watch, so you don’t know and believe your deranged websites like this one and friends.

D) I am probably older than you, and certainly more knowledgable and less biased.

Sorry.

By: Robin

Robin — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:54:31 +0000

Woops, make that the MAN shooter!!

By: Robin

Robin — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:51:14 +0000

First off Steve, (hoping he doesn’t mind me saying this) Kimmy is a MAN.
OK, now that we’ve got that one straight, you state very clearly that 21% declined to state. Why are you assuming that those 19% voted Democrat?
Secondly, because 52% of them stated openly that they did vote Democrat have you never heard of what should be journalistic integrity? Who do you see on the televised media and hear on the airwaves spouting off nothing but right-wing opinion? Which channel has a clear majority of viewers? You got it FOX. And who ignored the Scooter Libby admision to the prosecuters that Bush had authorized him to leak portions of the NIE report running up to the Iraq war and instead focused on the Cynthia McKinney altercation? http://mediamatters.org/items/200604070015
You got it, FOX. And whose right-wing anchorman is now the spokesman for Bush? You got it FOX. Wait, look at that one backwards, where did Bush’s press secretary come from? You got it, FOX. And which channel CONTINUES to not question Bush representatives such as Cheney when they STILL say Hussein had ties to Al-Qaeda? You got it, FOX. So Steve, when other news channels DO cover the scandals and the lies of this administration you CANNOT ignore the fact that the MOST watched news channel in America continues to allow out and out lies to be spoken and IGNORES important issues in favor of such things as the McKinney case and lest we not forget, any young girl who has been murdered or kidnapped INSTEAD of covering important matters that affect our safety as a nation AND our crimes as a nation. Sorry, but just because you don’t like what you hear does NOT make it something that should not be covered because you see Steve, this article itself is about a massive coverup. So, if the news outlets were as “liberal” (gosh, isn’t being liberal a major sin)as you claim they are, WHERE IS THE COVERAGE OF THE CLAIMS IN THIS ARTICLE? Did you even make the links Steve? Try this one from above http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a2547.htm#001
What do ya’ think Steve? Shouldn’t someone in the major media be picking this up since it is ALL OVER THE INTERNET? Or, if you want to say it’s a bunch of baloney, why isn’t THAT being covered since it’s all over the place. Remember Watergate (you’re probably too young but I am not). It was covered in a small article in I believe it was the Wall Street Journal shortly before the election. Guess what Steve, it didn’t hit the main media til after the election. Guess what happened Steve?
Nixon resigned in disgrace before he was impeached. De ja vu except that this is a midterm election and this one is a lame duck we’re stuck with for two more miserable years. If he resigns we get the DUCK SHOOTER to replace him. Lucky America!!

By: steve

steve — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:45:55 +0000

Sorry, ladies, but there is overwhelming evidence to support the leftwing bias of the media. Look up “media bias polls” on google to see what you find. The media wing of the Democratic party is the terrorists’ best ally, as they are well aware.

Just to pick one poll, in March and April 2005, the University of Connecticut’s Department of Public Policy surveyed 300 journalists nationwide — 120 who worked in the television industry and 180 who worked at newspapers and asked for whom they voted in the 2004 presidential election. In a report released May 16, 2005, the researchers disclosed that the journalists they surveyed selected Democratic challenger John Kerry over incumbent Republican President George W. Bush by a wide margin, 52 percent to 19 percent (with 1 percent choosing far-left independent candidate Ralph Nader). One out of five journalists (21 percent) refused to disclose their vote, while another six percent didn’t vote. This is at least a 3 to 1 bias amd undoubtedly far more, as “non-disclosure” means guilty Dems.

Feel free to resaarch further, girls. Provable facts are hard to dispute, though, and self-evidently the sad Arab media is far worse for the reasons previously addressed. Sorry.

By: kimmy

kimmy — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:33:08 +0000

Steve,
Bull! In the US the news is not biased to the left. The news published is only what is uncovered by reporters.
The main news is hidden by the White House by their constant lies.
They promised an open administration which has been hidden by lies.
Steve, again, BULL.

By: Robin

Robin — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:44:20 +0000

Oh yes Steve, the media in the US is liberal and will jump at any chance to harm the Republicans. Let’s see, I guess our media should not be reporting that there are no wmd’s, no links to Al-Qada, Republican ties to Jack Abrahamov, Tom DeLey scandals, Foley scandals, voting machine scandals, murders to innocent civilians in Iraq, Abu Gharib, the shredding of our Constitution as in the Patriot Act and illegal wire-tapping, the suspension of habeas corpus, campaign fraud, leaks done by the Republicans in order to out Valerie Plame because her husband outed the White House, bloopers by our ignorameous president (because we all know he is highly intelligent and literate, pictures of coffins returning home (because we all know our boys are heros), pictures of dead Iraqis (because we all know they died for freedom), no coverage should be given to all the retired generals speaking out against the war (because who the hell are they to say anything), on and on and on. Yes the press is liberal because it SOMETIMES covers horrible things about Republicans That is when you don’t have O’Riley, Hannity, Kristol, Limbaugh, Savitch, Will, Tony Snow-ex-Fox-cum-chief-spokesman-for-the-neo-con-agenda on and on spouting off nothing but crap. Oh, sorry, I forgot, those are the patriots among us who want to make sure our country is safe. Sorry, what WAS I thinking. :(

UN says Iraq seals data on civilian death toll
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/21/world/middleeast/21statistics.html?ex=1162357200&en=1ec02b45ab9c79c6&ei=5070

Just remember, no news is good news!!!

By: steve

steve — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:33:21 +0000

This is a joke, right? Or are you the people who think the Israelis were responsible for 9/11?

Let me explain this slow, so you can understand.

A) In the US, unlike the Mideast (except for Iraq) the government does not control the press. I’d prefer a little more control,as in prosecution for publshing national secrets, but that’s not how we do things.

B) The US media, as a broad group, is leftist and hates the administration. ANY opportunity to harm Republicans or The President is an opportunity they will leap at, regardless of harm to the nation.

However, they are not all stupid and crazy, and they have been burned with false reports in the past,as Dan Rather (former newsman,now functionally unemployed ) will attest. This is a hoax. Arab media is not to be believed, due to lack of professionalism, poor training, lack of intelligence (also a US problem), no oversight by contrasting media to prove them wrong, and outrageous bias.

Sorry.

By: angus

angus — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:53:29 +0000

I know very little about nukes, but don’t they require a chain reaction to produce an explosion? — that is, they must be deliberately set off.

By: Rumsfeld Tells Critics to “Back-off” « Wa Salaam

Rumsfeld Tells Critics to “Back-off” « Wa Salaam — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:07:52 +0000

[...] http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/10/28/tactical-nuclear-weapon-detonated-in-iraq/ [...]

By: Robin

Robin — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:55:16 +0000

I am presently sitting here after just reading this thread so upset that I don’t know where to begin. I watched the videos, I read all the links, but I wish to focus on the ones that seem to be undeniable, those citing the fatalities which are being covered up, specifically, the one from TBR and Kavkas. Then we also have the coverup of the massive Iraqi fatalities. Coverups, coverups and more coverups.
Here in the States let it PLEASE be known, our general public is both hoodwinked AND even when told, largely resistant in many quarters to the news from the “other side”. But there are those who are willing to listen and there are those who are taking a stand. For various reasons, for different objectives, there are MANY of us here in the States who are fighting with our every last means available to end our involvement in Iraq. I make absolutely NO excuses for Americans who continue to support this war or those who took so long to come to the conclusion that we have been lied to. Some of us knew from day one the invasion was a total farce, and some only now, even after enlisting in the military, are coming to that conclusion. But the fact is that where we stand now is the only point from whence we can take action, since the past is already done, we MUST work from this point on and keep a clear aim when calculating what to do against these atrocities.
Yes the election is coming up, and yes there is definitely a massive rising tide against the war in Iraq. It is all going to hell in a hand basket for the neocons and yet they are still “ticking”, actually “ticking” like a massive bomb with American citizens running around scurrying not knowing quite what to do. But there ARE some who are focused and these are the ones who actually know best and can be trusted the most to give us the truth, those in the military themselves who are speaking out and resisting. They are 100% credible and CANNOT be denied. It is these people the American public should be listening to, NOT the propaganda being given by our government who has their own tail in the bear trap going down, down, down.
There are American organizations out there to participate in and contact. Here are a few:
Courage to Resist http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/ COURAGE TO RESIST is a group of concerned community members, veterans and military families that supports military objectors to illegal war and occupation and the policies of empire. Our People Power strategy weakens the pillars that maintain war and occupation in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere by supporting GI resistance, counter-recruitment and draft resistance, which cuts off the supply of troops
Veterans for Peace http://www.veteransforpeace.org/
Iraqi Veterans Against the War http://www.ivaw.org/
Thank You Lieutenant.orghttp://www.thankyoult.org/ This organization is a grassroots organization to support First Lt. Ehren Watada who is the first commisioned officer to refuse deployment to Iraq. He is currently facing court marshall and up to 81/2 years in prison for his stance. It is his stance that the war in Iraq is illegal per international treaty and per our Constitution. His lawyers are using this defense and putting the war on trial.

Haitham, I have forwarded this information to Bob and Rosa Watada who are currently on a major tour of the US sponsored by Veterans for Peace. I do not know where it will go, but it has been sent. Hopefully they will forward this information to the head of VFP who I believe is on the tour with them. Thank you for posting this vital information which we do NOT get here in the States. Together, those of us who are fighting in whatever way we can, will bring an end to our occupation and Inshallah, Iraq will rise from the ashes my government has created.

By: La insurgencia destroza la base gringa de Camp Falcon en Bagdad at biTs RojiVerdes

Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:07:16 +0000

[...] Aunque lo m?curioso es que de 6.000 soldados que habitan la base no hay ni un s????herido a pesar de la gran explosi????ue algunos ya achacan a la destrucci????e una bomba nuclear «t?ica», aunque no es muy probable. Otras fuentes hablan de 300 muertos que han sido discretamente evacuados de la zona al hospital militar de al-Habbaniya y dan una lista de nombres que no ha sido hecha p?a en los EEUU porque significar?el fin de los republicanos en las pr????as elecciones de primeros de noviembre. [...]

By: Haitham

Haitham — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:19:31 +0000

moclippa,

I agree, the second video might not be at all related to this incident, however their are claims around some blogs that the date is wrong mistakly by YouTube. But anyway, I don’t link the two as I said, but thought worth mentioning since it is one of the footage reported about this same incident which toke place on Oct 11-12th, 2006.

As for rense picture, I personally doubt them. I doubt that they are of the camp in question here, specially that they are taken from air and the Americans are accusing Iraqi translators of revealing the coordinations of ammo dump, yet they leak all these photos next day!! It looks easier for resistance to find coordinations of the American camp by searching the Internet!!!