Skip to content

Nakba: For Palestinians, memory matters

If you want to be notified the next time we publish something, sign up for FREE email alerts or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Despite gains made to make 'occupation' the frame of reference in understanding what is going on in the Occupied Palestine, to a large extent the occupation continues to remain "invisible".

The occupation's invisibility is mainly credited to propaganda-influenced media reports. Repeated studies of the media's coverage of Palestine/Israel have highlighted the prevalent pro-Israeli bias. A bias that flows from the refusal to frame individual events in the context of the occupation or a colonisation-resistance dynamic. Thus to average Western readers and listeners, terms like "Palestine" and "occupation" become almost completely alien.

It is time to show, explain and uncover the reality of occupation to those in the West who really can make a difference. It is time to make the occupation the primary lens through which people see the sad events in Occupied Palestine from sea to river.

May 15 may be the most important – and the most overlooked – date in Palestinian history. Here are few noteworthy words from a Palestinian American to commemorate the 59th Anniversary of the Palestinian Nakba (catastrophe).

For Palestinians, memory matters
It provides a blueprint for their future

by George Bisharat

Sunday, May 13, 2007 – San Francisco Chronicle

Why do some people have the power to remember, while others are asked to forget? That question is especially poignant at this time of year, as we move from Holocaust Remembrance day in early spring to Monday's anniversary of Israel's declaration of independence on May 14, 1948.

In the months surrounding that date, Jewish forces expelled, or intimidated into flight, an estimated 750,000 Palestinians. A living, breathing, society that had existed in Palestine for centuries was smashed and fragmented, and a new society built on its ruins.

Few Palestinian families lack a personal narrative of loss from that period — an uncle killed, or a branch of the family that fled north while the others fled east, never to be reunited, or homes, offices, orchards and other property seized. Ever since, Palestinians worldwide have commemorated May 15 as Nakba (Catastrophe) Day.

No ethical person would admonish Jews to "forget the Holocaust." Indeed, recent decades have witnessed victims of that terrible era not only remembering, but also regaining paintings and financial assets seized by the Nazis — and justifiably so.

Other victims of mass wrongs — interned Japanese Americans, enslaved African Americans, and Armenians subjected to a genocide that may have later convinced Hitler of the feasibility of mass killings — receive at least respectful consideration of their cases, even while responses to their claims have differed.

Yet in dialogues with Israelis, and some Americans, Palestinians are repeatedly admonished to "forget the past," that looking back is "not constructive" and "doesn't get us closer to a solution." Ironically, Palestinians live the consequences of the past every day — whether as exiles from their homeland, or as members of an oppressed minority within Israel, or as subjects of a brutal and violent military occupation.

In the West we are amply reminded of the suffering of Jewish people in World War II. Our newspaper featured several stories on local survivors of the Nazi holocaust around Holocaust Remembrance Day (an Israeli national holiday that is widely observed in the United States). My daughter has read at least one book on the Nazi holocaust every year since middle school. Last year, in ninth grade English literature alone, she read three. But we seldom confront the impact of Israel's policies on Palestinians.

It is the "security of the Jewish people" that has rationalized Israel's takeover of Palestinian lands, both in the past in Israel, and more recently in the occupied West Bank. There, most Palestinian children negotiate one of the 500 Israeli checkpoints and other barriers to movement just to reach school each day. Meanwhile, Israel's program of colonization of the West Bank grinds ahead relentlessly, implanting ever more Israeli settlers who must be "protected" from those Palestinians not reconciled to the theft of their homes and fields.

The primacy of Jewish security over rights of Palestinians — to property, education, health care, a chance to make a living, and, also to security — is seldom challenged.

Unfortunately, remembering the Nazi Holocaust — something morally incumbent on all of us — has seemingly become entangled with, and even an instrument of, the amnesia some would force on Palestinians. Israel is enveloped in an aura of ethical propriety that makes it unseemly, even "anti-Semitic" to question its denial of Palestinian rights.

As Israeli journalist Amira Hass recently observed: "Turning the Holocaust into a political asset serves Israel primarily in its fight against the Palestinians. When the Holocaust is on one side of the scale, along with the guilty (and rightly so) conscience of the West, the dispossession of the Palestinian people from their homeland in 1948 is minimized and blurred."

What this demonstrates is that memory is not just an idle capacity. Rather, who can remember, and who can be made to forget, is, fundamentally, an expression of power.

Equally importantly, however, memory can provide a blueprint for the future — a vision of a solution to seek, or an outcome to avoid. My Palestinian father grew up in Jerusalem before Israel was founded and the Palestinians expelled, when Muslims, Christians and Jews lived in peace and mutual respect. Recalling that past provides a vision for an alternative future — one involving equal rights and tolerance, rather than the domination of one ethno-religious group over others.

Thus, what Palestinians are really being commanded is not just to forget their past, but instead to forget their future, too. That they will never do.

George Bisharat is professor of law at Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. He writes frequently about the Middle East. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page E – 3 of the San Francisco Chronicle and reprinted with permission from the author.

We shall not forget, and occupation will not conquer our souls.

Print
Share/Bookmark

{ 16 } Comments

  1. brownfemipower | May 15, 2007 at 4:13 am | Permalink

    thank you for posting this haitham.
    I had no idea about any of this–i have a friend who's family was separated, but she has never talked about this being the reason why. this helps me to understand–thank you so much.

  2. Haitham | May 15, 2007 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    I'm happy it was informative. Thank you for reading it, bfp!

  3. bluepilgrim | May 16, 2007 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    I almost thought you were saying something which I am not sure you said, but the thought was implanted in my mind. "Occupation" is the wrong word. The US is occupying Iraq — that is, the US is in Iraq doing things to the Iraqis on their native soil. But many Palestinians are not on their native soil: they have been displaced from they lived. They have been carted off to prison, their homeland stolen. How can refugees — prisoners — be occupied? What is occupied is their former lands, but a concentration camp cannot be occupied by the oppressors — only by the prisoners. Let us call what is happening not "occupation" but "imprisonment".

  4. Kebz | May 16, 2007 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Found your excellent blog by accident. Will add it to the links on my blog: http://j4p.blogspot.com

    best wishes

  5. Haitham | May 16, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    bluepilgrim,

    Good question.

    First, we agree that refugees are people displaced from their homes and lands and not allowed to return to them. Now, is sound that you are not aware that some Palestinians who were ethnically cleansed from their land during and after 1948 war lives in West Bank and Gaza camps. Other live outside Palestine.

    To give you an example, here are some figures from the UNRWA (I don't know how far that is up to date):

    CAMP – - – NUMBER OF REGISTERED REFUGEES
    Jabalia – - – 106,621
    Rafah – - – 96,743
    Beach 79,853
    Nuseirat – - – 58,139
    Khan Younis – - – 60,673
    Bureij – - – 29,414
    Maghazi – - – 22,840
    Deir el-Balah – - – 19,847

    West bank:

    CAMP – - – NUMBER OF REGISTERED REFUGEES
    Aqabat Jabr – - – 5,510
    Ein el-Sultan – - – 1,723
    Shu'fat – - – 10,069
    Am'ari – - – 8,805
    Kalandia – - – 10,024
    Deir Ammar – - – 2,275
    Jalazone – - – 10,390
    Fawwar – - – 7,630
    Arroub – - – 9,859
    Dheisheh – - – 12,045
    Aida – - – 4,534
    Beit Jibrin – - – 2,025
    Far'a – - – 7,244
    Camp No.1 – - - 6,508
    Askar – - – 14,629
    Balata – - – 21,903
    Tulkarm – - – 17,455
    Nur Shams – - - 8,659
    Jenin – - – 15,496

    Now, what is left to say? I guess everyone knows that Gaza and West bank are under occupation, hence, these refugees are under occupation.

  6. bluepilgrim | May 16, 2007 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Haitham. The point I am trying to make is that calling it 'occupation' sounds as if the Palestinians were living where they always had, with the occupiers there too — and if the Israelis just all moved to Tel Aviv everything would return to "normal" (normal after the original invasion). But really that land has been stolen and the people who had lived for generations made into refugees — prisoners. If all the Israelis went to live in Tel Aviv the Palestinians would be left far from there ancestral land and farms — stuck out in camps, their families houses destoyed, and no place to live and work.

    Suppose that the Palestinians had been gathered up in 1948 and shipped to the middle of the Australian outback, and left there alone — with no occupiers or prison camps, even? That would still have been a disaster and a theft of their lands. The word "occupation" tells only a part of the story, and is deceptive in that way. Imprisonment or ethnic cleansing better conveys what happened.

    This is similar to calling the Iraqi resistance "insurgents" which implies that the puppet government of Iraq is legitimate, rising in revolt against legitimately established government. But the resistance is not revolting because the occupation by the US and its puppets is not legitimate — no more than the settlers in Palestine are there legitimately. We should avoid using words which assume any legitimacy to these aggressive actions and oppression.

  7. bluepilgrim | May 16, 2007 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    My apologies for the addenda and second post, but it occured to me that perhaps the word "occupation" (of Palestine) should be replaced with "annexation" — the stealing of land and making it part of Israel.

  8. Michael Ben-Nes | May 16, 2007 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    Well, I assume its time for an Israeli Jew to talk.

    I will not argue on justice as its subjective. This is just irrelevant for a post. I assume you all aware that we ( at least most of Israeli Jews ) think that 1948 war was a live or death war and there was no option for peace.

    I'm well aware that any human being on earth has the full right to live in freedom of mind and body. and thats its irrelevant if his grandfather was the cause for his current suffer or wasn't.

    As I see it there are two problems from my side.

    1. I don't trust the Palestinians. I have the bad feeling that some of them will murder me and my family on first chance.

    2. I'm not going to leave the house for any one the will claim that this land was his 60 years ago. I was born in Israel and I hope to die there an old man.

    I'm not sure there is a right solution for both sides but I hope there is.

    Time will tell

  9. bluepilgrim | May 17, 2007 at 1:02 am | Permalink

    From my pespective…

    Micheal, I'm sure that some Palestininns would gladly murder you and your family — just as Al Qaeda would gladly murder many people. Yet, there are reasons for that, and it is hardly universal of all Palestinians. Similarly, there are many Jews, Israelis included, who want justice for the Palestinians. Justice, of course, is a basic Jewish value. But fear and anger get in the way on all sides.

    Just as you want a home, so do the Palestinians. In a peaceful society people of various religions and ethnicities live next to each other – and that was true in Palestine in the past. It is not really the 'nation' which matters, but the people. "the State of Israel" is not as important as the Holy Lands: people living together in peace, security, productivity, freedom, and happiness, as both interpretions of the G-D of Abraham would have it.

    There are no perfect and complete solutions, but unless everyone is treated with justice then the warring will never end. The plain truth is that Israel cannot be both a theocracy or enthocracy AND a democracy. The truth is also that great injustice has been done — to the Jews before 1948, and to the Palestinians after. Only by working together can these be put into the past; holding memories is one thing but holding grudges is another. Memories should inform the efforts for the future. Perhaps some sort of truth and reconcilliation process as in South Africa would help, but that means that those on both sides must make the effort to see the other side's point of view and abandon fear, greed, violence, and those who propagate them.

    It is not just a matter of time will tell, as in waiting, but of choice. If the effort is not made, and sustained, then only more death and misery will follow. We cannot let the abstractions of politics intefere with human values and rights. If human values and justice are the foremost things in mind, then one state, two state, or a no state Holy Land protectorate, is immaterial — mere trappings. If human values are ignored then no political arrangement has any meaning. Both the Jews of Israel and the Muslims and Christians of Palestinian are brothers from ancient times and shared origins — much closer and sharing much more than with any other peoples. Working together you can all share a greatness and a love yet unseen in the world — if that is what is what the people choose.

  10. Michael Ben-Nes | May 17, 2007 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    You say wisely but the problem is that some wont cope with your words.

    I think that education is the key. I watched carefully the last events in Gaza strips and frankly its just hard to understand the Palestinians that killing each other.
    Some of the peaceful Palestinians in Gaza suggest that they where better under "Israeli control". My feeling that you don't replace bad thing with another bad thing and at this point the Palestinians should take responsibility on their future.

    As I see it I cant really talk to them in this state but I can:
    1. try to minimize the mistrust between Israeli Arabs & Israeli Jews.
    2. Understand & explain responsibility of the people for the greater good.
    3. teach that right & wrong is extremely subjective and we should always look through our "so called enemies" eyes.

    I think the other side should:
    1. Educate people to understand peace is always better then war.
    2. That the only one that can push the Palestinians to a better future is the Palestinians them self. The same way we did ( the Jews ).

    I hope that the future will bring us a new political age without borders at all. I just don't understand why someone from Africa is not allowed to live in the USA ( for example ). The freedom to live where you feel good as long as you don't harm others, seems to me as a basic right.

  11. bluepilgrim | May 17, 2007 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    From what I've been seeing the US, and I think Israel too, has been working to drive a wedge between Fatah and Hamas in the old 'divide and conquer' tactic (and arming Fatah). That's an old standby for the CIA all over the world.The Palestinians have very little ability to take responsibility, even for daily survival. In both the US and Israel, and to a degree in Palestine, and elsewhere in the Middle East, the 'gangsters' have much of the power. This is part of US policy in controlling other nations. Find the book or online material by John Perkins (author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man) and you can see how this works. Smedly Butler's book War is a Racket is online too. There are profits to made in war.

    I've spent much time trying to wake people up in the US to the evils of the government, and it's slow and difficult; there are people in Israel, and other nations trying to the same in their countries. The people are often deceived by their governments, and controlled by them through disinformation. In Palestine, people are repressed, some of it from their own leaders, but to the greatest extent by Israel, with the support of the US.

    The most difficult thing to do is for the people to wake up and understand how evil their governments actions are — people want to believe their countries and leaders are honest and good, but that often is not the case: there are always gangsters trying to control governments, and too often they succeed. We in the peace movement in the US are often called traitors for opposing the government and exposing it's lies, but it is the gangsters in government who are hurting the country and the people. I think that's true in Israel too. Now the US government is trying to blame the Iraqis for the problems there, and of course some of the Iraqis do terrible things, but it is the US which is mostly to blame. If you look further at Israel and the problems in Palestine you will find a similar situation.

    All of us, the people of the world who want peace, need to learn the truth and work together to oppose the gangsters in all our nations.

  12. Robin | May 17, 2007 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    '2. That the only one that can push the Palestinians to a better future is the Palestinians them self. The same way we did ( the Jews ).'

    The problem with this sentence is that the way the Zionists (NOT Jews, because NOT all Jews are Zionists and this can be EASILY found when going back in the history books to see that CERTAINLY not all Jews agreed with establishing a state which depended on pushing another people off their land) "pushed themselves to a better future" by establishing a state they call their own, with aliya guaranteeing citizenship, is that this was AT THE EXPENSE of the Palestinians who lived there on this land for MILENIA. Until Zionists admit and reverse the actions of their "dream come true" and allow for the right of return as stated in UN resolution 194, there can be NO JUST peace. Please read Bluepilgrim's analysis again, the peoples of this land, Jews, Christians and Muslims MUST be allowed to live together peacefully and it is Israel who is preventing this with their own Zionist policies. NO ONE is denying that great injustices were done to Jewish people, but the way to rectify this is NOT to commit an injustice against another people so that a POLITICAL state can be created denying the rights to those displaced.

  13. Michael Ben-Nes | May 18, 2007 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Do I hear a mantra ? ohh well i'm used to mantras.

    Where to begin.

    bluepilgrim, I wish we where smart as you think. And I strongly believe that more then Israel is smart the Arabs just keep repeating their mistake over and over.
    And for books. on every topic that you will choose I can bring two different versions ( if not more ). But thats ok, like most people ( Jews / Arabs / Whatever ) continue to live in your black / white world.

    Robin, Do you really think there is something constant called JUST ?
    Do you think I care if some of the Jews think its wrong or right ? Its the same as you don't care about those: http://www.arabsforisrael.com

    Many nations have disappeared from the surface of the world in the past. and many more will in the future. Thats more related to survival then just from my point of view.
    My point is very simple, you want to barricade blindly behind what you think is "just" ? Ok, thats fine by me, but don't expect to something different from my side.

  14. bluepilgrim | May 18, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    I did not recommend the book to enter into a book counting contest, but for the content. I can see you closing your mind in this post; I hope you will look for the truth, as difficult as it is to acknowledge. It takes time you have to keep coming back to it. Don't believe everything you think — most things any of us think are largely wrong.

    The site you link is founded by
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonie_Darwish … interesting reading about her. She hardly seems objective.

    As for justice, if you don't have love for justice then love for G-d has no meaning.

  15. Robin | May 18, 2007 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Quote from Michael:

    "Robin, Do you really think there is something constant called JUST ?

    Answer: You're damn right I do and it does NOT include harming others.

  16. bluepilgrim | May 19, 2007 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Here is good article/talk by Ilan Pappe, the Israeli historian, well worth reading.

    http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=107&ItemID=12365 or http://www.ilanpappe.org/Interviews/The History of Israel Reconsidered.html

    He was on http://www.flashpoints.net/ tonight, May 18 2007(starting 1/2 hour into the broadcast) download http://aud1.kpfa.org/data/20070517-Thu1700.mp3 . He makes another point — he says it should not be called nakba: nakba is a catastrophe, something that happens, like an earthquake — but 1948 did not just happen accidentally.

{ 1 } Trackback

  1. [...] which marked the celebration of the Nakba, Daily Kos blew the last bridge it had with the Palestinian voices. Midday GMT, the news started [...]