Not one, not two, welcome to ‘three-state’ solution!

by Haitham Sabbah on 06/15/2007

email

Palestine MapGaza Strip - Friday: one day after Hamas seized control there after more than 100 (other reports say over 200) people were killed, many of them execution style (by Fatah and Hamas), and it's not over yet. The green flag of Hamas flies over government buildings in Gaza now, at least in front of those that are still standing.

Once there was a "debate" (no real negotiations) about two states, Palestinian state and Israel. Today, there are "debates" about three of them.

Not defending Hamas, but all reports point to its militia to have violently seized control of Gaza as if Fatah militia (Dahlan's to be in particular) is angles and clean handed. No one wants to believe the fact that all what is going there was well planned by Israel, Americans, corrupted Palestinian Authority and executed by Dahlan's militia.

Ten days ago, Dennis Ross, former U.S. Mideast envoy, described exactly what is happening on ground today. He said:

Counter Islamists gains in Gaza
By Dennis Ross

In several days of discussions in Jerusalem and Ramallah recently, I was struck by the nature of the debate I witnessed in both places.

To my surprise, it wasn't about the stalemate in the peace process or the Arab peace initiative. It was about the conflict between Palestinian organizations in Gaza -- Hamas vs. Fatah -- and whether Gaza was in fact already lost to the Islamists. Both Israelis and Palestinians were wondering about the consequences of Gaza's becoming, in their word, "Hamastan."

Not all felt Gaza was lost. Some said Israel should let weapons and ammunition get to Fatah forces in Gaza to battle Hamas. I also heard from Palestinians and Israelis alike that Egypt could do much more to prevent Hamas from receiving smuggled arms and money through the Sinai tunnels running into Gaza.

But for every Palestinian and Israeli who argued for arming Fatah, I heard a contrary point of view that at this point it might not make any difference. The consensus was that Hamas had made a deliberate calculation to attack all key security positions held by Fatah in Gaza and that the Fatah forces now had few, if any, senior commanders still in that area.

All those I spoke with were worried about the consequences of Gaza's becoming an Islamist enclave. They saw it offering inspiration to other Islamists throughout the Middle East and providing a new haven for Islamists of all stripes. They feared it would spell the end of even the possibility of a two-state solution. Most were convinced Hamas would never accept peace with Israel.

Interestingly, there was consensus among Israelis and Palestinians on the dangers of Gaza's becoming a failed state. No one thought it would be easy to isolate and contain -- or had any clear ideas on how to respond to such a development. Israelis voiced no desire to go back into a densely populated place where nearly everyone has weapons and Israel would face, as one person told me, "our own Baghdad." But few Israelis felt they could tolerate continued rocket fire out of Gaza.

Their conclusion: If Egypt does not act more decisively, Israel may have to occupy the area near the Egyptian border to stop the smuggling of larger and more effective weapons.

As for Palestinians, the most striking conclusion was that it was essential that Hamas not succeed in the West Bank the way it is succeeding in Gaza. Fear is a great motivator, perhaps enough to overcome the personal rivalries that have hobbled Fatah in its competition with Hamas. I certainly found a new readiness among the young guard of Fatah (and the activists who represent Fatah's third and fourth generations) to organize themselves at the grass roots and rebrand Fatah. They know they lost the elections because of their divisions, the corruption of the old guard and their inability to respond to the needs of the Palestinian public. I saw a new awareness that Fatah must offer services and programs, not just words, if it is to preserve its hold on the West Bank.

Among some I heard an interesting proposal: Let's make the West Bank work -- socially, economically and institutionally -- then hold up our model of success in contrast to the failure of Gaza, where functional unemployment is close to 70 percent. Let Hamas preside over a dysfunctional, lawless state. We will build our own. Let's create understandings with Jordan and Israel for at least economic confederation and security. And if Hamas still hangs on in Gaza, perhaps there can be a "three-state solution."

Sounds good in theory, but I doubt it would work. No matter how sensible confederation between the Palestinian state and Jordan might be, at least economically, a failed state in Gaza would be a constant source of instability. Israel wouldn't find it easy to occupy just a narrow strip of territory to stop smuggling. The Israeli presence would invite an insurgency much like the one Israel faced in southern Lebanon. No alternative international force is likely to be vigilant or serious enough to do an effective job -- just look at Lebanon.

Moreover, while West Bank and Gaza Palestinians have much that divides them, they still have a common identity as Palestinians; the creation of a Palestinian state without Gaza would be an endless source of grievance and irredentism.

So what is to be done? If a failed state in Gaza is not acceptable, more has to be done now to prevent it. Egypt, while it has made commitments to stop the smuggling, does not see the situation as a national security threat. We will need to put a spotlight on this to change the Egyptian calculus and, at a minimum, to move Egypt to stop Hamas from accumulating more weaponry and money. If Fatah does have a plan for bolstering its forces in Gaza, it is worth supporting it by coordinating with the Israelis and Egyptians -- not to produce a bloodbath in Gaza but to deter Hamas from seeking to impose itself there.

The logic of having donors (public and private) working with Fatah where it seeks to rebrand itself makes sense for the West Bank and Gaza. What Hamas has done in Gaza has provided a wake-up call for Fatah and Palestinian independents. They now know they have to compete socially, economically and politically. They need help to do so. It is time we, the other donors and the Saudis and the Gulf states woke up to the reality that if we don't help remake Fatah, we may face a future in which Islamists control the Palestinian issue and neither a two-state nor a three-state solution will be in the cards.

three_state_solutionNow what? Is this anyone's idea of how things would turn out in the yet-to-be-born Palestinian state?

After three days of a vicious war between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza strip, they both killed scores of Palestinians. They terrorized their own people, and they made a questionable future even more uncertain. When Hamas gunmen took over the Gaza headquarters of Fatah and emptied file cabinets into the street.

What came out flying of the Israeli, US and corrupt Palestinian Authority (PA) windows were the laid plans of politicians and pundits for a future Palestinian state.

The much-touted two-state solution -- one Israel and one Palestine, living side by side in peace -- now Israel and corrupt PA made looks like a relic of simpler times. Now we are forced to believe by the censored media and our corrupt PA to have two-state dissolution: two Palestinian entities, Gaza and the West Bank, each ruled by different governments with sharply different ideologies. But even if Abbas says he has dissolved the Hamas-led government, the two sides' differences will not easily disappear. So now what? A three-state solution? How can this crisis be solved?

As people in Gaza begin to clean up after the coup, back in the West Bank, President Mahmoud Abbas has dissolved the coalition government set up with Hamas and appears in control of West Bank as planned.

Talking about a three-state solution would work very well for Israel. With Fatah and the corrupted PA located in the West Bank, Hamas in Gaza, it now makes Israel's job much easier to take out Hamas in Gaza. Soon, Israel will continue its invasion in Gaza, led by new elected leader of Labor Party, Barak, as the Israeli "defense" mister; and then turn back to Fatah in West Bank and voilà...Israel wins.

That probably will happen, though. Most likely, Hamas will continue to tighten its grip and further indoctrinate/pervert the minds of people, so will Fatah in West Bank, leading to a slow and steady buildup with the grand finale involving Israel in an epic showdown. Hopefully someone can intervene before it is too late once again.

These are dark days for Palestinians: Hamas in Gaza ghetto, Fatah in West Bank ghetto and Israel occupying both, the vast majority of their victims are Palestinians and Palestine future.

Get Free Updates From Sabbah Report

Insider Updates

Sign up to receive our daily newsletter.


{ 14 comments }

1 Rami June 16, 2007 at 3:41 am

hello

whatever the outcome; people will suffer more, either under Hamas gov or under Fatah gov. we should all understand that two factions fighting each other for a failed Authority are both failed factions themselves. the history will never forgive either of them for the disasters they brought to people. while poor paletinians are killed in Iraq, lebanon and humilated in the rest of the world, they are fighting each other for some political gains!!!!!!!!!! and what gains while Israel surrounding them like a flok of sheep. weapons should be pointed towards the real enemy to the east ( and I don’t mean west bank here)

take care, may god forgive and may the people forget

2 kimmy June 16, 2007 at 12:37 pm

Why is it the people in power and have the money to survive any problems tell the people who have nothing to trust them.
Does this make sense?
People in power with money constantly use the phrase “trust me”.
That is the equivilent to “fuck you”.
Pres. Chavez has the right idea. If you have excess, give it away.
Will the leaders of Hamas or Fatah share their wealth?
I think not!
They will sit in their gilded towers and play their games at the cost of Palestinian lives.
And the Israelis love it.
Hamas and Fatah,
Enjoy your stupidity.
At your expense, you have caused deaths that should have not happened.
At your expense, you have made the Palestinian problem an internal problem. Not a problem for Israel.
I hope both of you are happy!

3 desertpeace June 16, 2007 at 2:50 pm

I posted about the ‘three state concept’ on Wednesday…
http://desertpeace.blogspot.com/2007/06/israelpalestine-three-state-solution.html

4 Thameen June 16, 2007 at 9:21 pm

Dear Haitham,

Black days for us indeed, but these black days did not come out suddenly, but were the final result of a gradual deterioration.

I want to thank you for a balanced view of the situation. Many Palestine international bloggers are so fixated with their blame to US that they are blinded to the destructive trends that are evolving in the Palestinian society itself. It is true that both the US and Israel and also Syria and Iran are taking advantage of our situation, but that shoul not blind us to the fact that our leadership has failed and our ppl in Palestine has in many areas accepted or adopted ideologies and behaviours the results of which we are seing these days.

TH

5 Holly ~ Destiny's mommy~Brenda Greenwood's sister June 17, 2007 at 4:17 am

:’( Black days indeed…..It is so sad and we only hear a part of it over here. I feel so bad for the people, community, the mothers.
All this bloodshed, loss, and horror. Now all this talk of 3 states whereas before it was 2 and it should have or presumably been 1. All I can say is God be with them and hopefully end their sorrow soon. This group pf people has suffered far enough.

6 Kris June 17, 2007 at 1:45 pm

I fear we may soon witness an impune Israeli strike in Gaza, to curb Hamas’ control over the Strip.

7 Topo June 17, 2007 at 3:10 pm

This conflict is not between Hamas and Fatah, but between true Palestinian patriots and a few elements of America/Israel paid agents in Fatah.

8 Karin June 17, 2007 at 11:40 pm

Thanks to that coup we have a situation NOBODY wants: two Palestinian entities … aside Israel which as you state, would make a three-state solution! The new Iraeli defense minister Barak has sinister plans though … he states it is not a matter of IF they will enter Gza in order to take on Hamas – but WHEN … and that sound VEEEERY ominous to me! It is by FAR not over … I am afraid the whole nightmare has barely started!
The fact Hamas is in power in Gaza makes it, in the world’s eyes, “legitimate” for Israel to re-enter Gaza … and only GOD knows how MANY people will have to pay then with their lives. I personally don’t care whatsoever about the “egos” of the factions and categorically reject any kind of violence – I care about the PEOPLE! THEY deserve a LIFE, together with dignity, freedom and justice!
I pray for them … though I’m afraid there are dark times ahead of them!

9 toasterhead June 18, 2007 at 1:25 pm

I think the talk of a three- or even two-state solution is ludicrous. A state without control of its own water resources, ports, border crossings, and essential infrastructure is not a state.

10 Kebz June 18, 2007 at 7:41 pm

I agree with toasterhead. Hamas has NOT in fact proclaimed an islamic state and continues to ask for dialogue with Fatah but they are being rebuffed. Despite the killings by both sides, Hamas is fundamentally not claiming sovereignty alone over Gaza and says they are government of all the Palestinian people as they were elected by people in the west bank and Gaza not Gaza alone. The Fatah leaders are continuing to betray Palestinians by accepting Israeli US proposals for funding and money for their ‘emergency government’. Correct me if I am wrong but this emergency government headed by Israels choice as PM is not constitutional (even if the constitution is messed up). Gaza is sorrounded on all sides and its water, airspace, electricity and fuel controlled by zionists. They do not have a state, merely a prison.

11 justice June 18, 2007 at 9:49 pm

“… Hamas will continue to tighten its grip and further indoctrinate/pervert the minds of people” are words that only a zionazi barbarian can utter.

12 kimmy June 23, 2007 at 11:18 am

This is excatly what the Israelis want. Divide and conquor. (Haitham, I will not discuss spelling with you because I will most likely loose.)LOL

13 Haitham June 23, 2007 at 11:55 am

Kimmy,

Me blushing :(

I trust that you all know that “Englize” is not my first language and you will excuse me ;)

14 kimmy June 23, 2007 at 12:11 pm

I am beninning to think that you are better than me. LOL

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: