Comments on: Loose Change http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/ Because Silence is Complicity! Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nicholashttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-341019 Nicholas Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:55:16 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-341019 Look, one can't deny that observations and even some facts presented in "Loose Change" disturbingly correlate with the events leading up to and including and after 9/11. But, it also displays the characteristics of a Michael Moore documentary, i.e. is very subjective to the authors personal beliefs, only presents evidence that proves in accordance with the documentarian's points of perspective, and knowingly, or at least seemingly, distorts information in order to provide a "punchline". And while I deeply applaud their efforts to find the truth, as I myself am certain that much more was involved in 9/11 than what was and is portrayed by the media propaganda that has forever followed since, and even agree with them on many of the points they make, it must be noted that other evidence exists from more reliable sources, which call into question their sources of information; that being the only substance of their suppositions. Furthermore, I do not believe that anyone, and especially amateurs, is capable of discovering the actual "truth" behind these events until more time has elapsed, more people have come forward, and more stringent and accurate investigations have taken place. So, while "Loose Change" is a good start, I recommend that you, and anyone else who has watched the film, follow their recommendations of conducting your own research and coming to your own conclusions. Look, one can’t deny that observations and even some facts presented in “Loose Change” disturbingly correlate with the events leading up to and including and after 9/11. But, it also displays the characteristics of a Michael Moore documentary, i.e. is very subjective to the authors personal beliefs, only presents evidence that proves in accordance with the documentarian’s points of perspective, and knowingly, or at least seemingly, distorts information in order to provide a “punchline”. And while I deeply applaud their efforts to find the truth, as I myself am certain that much more was involved in 9/11 than what was and is portrayed by the media propaganda that has forever followed since, and even agree with them on many of the points they make, it must be noted that other evidence exists from more reliable sources, which call into question their sources of information; that being the only substance of their suppositions. Furthermore, I do not believe that anyone, and especially amateurs, is capable of discovering the actual “truth” behind these events until more time has elapsed, more people have come forward, and more stringent and accurate investigations have taken place. So, while “Loose Change” is a good start, I recommend that you, and anyone else who has watched the film, follow their recommendations of conducting your own research and coming to your own conclusions.

]]> By: James Edwardshttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-340568 James Edwards Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:41:31 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-340568 Why not? Why not?

]]> By: Sophiahttp://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-333673 Sophia Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:49:09 +0000 http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/09/14/loose-change/#comment-333673 Haitham, Some conspiracy theories were made in order to discredit the very idea of consipracy. Loose Change has proved to be one of these. While in the case of 9/11 I really believe in some sort of conspiracy, I don't think Loose Change is the correct answer. Haitham,

Some conspiracy theories were made in order to discredit the very idea of consipracy. Loose Change has proved to be one of these. While in the case of 9/11 I really believe in some sort of conspiracy, I don’t think Loose Change is the correct answer.

]]>