Playboy Magazine, goes Anti-Semitic!?
Written by Haitham Sabbah on 03. October 2007, 0119hrs // Part of Haitham Sabbah's adventure in Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Israel, Media, Zionism // Other posts by Haitham Sabbah
What does Playboy Magazine have in common with all those people, newspapers, magazines, editors, journalists, etc. listed by the infamous Zionist CAMERA as anti-Semite?
The answer is simple:
Playboy magazine, the racy but popular men’s magazine, has published in its October 2007 issue an article comparing Israel to apartheid South Africa. - CAMERA
There you go, Playboy dared to publish an article that criticize Israel and had the courage to describe what Israel does as war crimes. Result: CAMERA does not allow and works to silence any American media to say a single true word about ‘the only terrorist country in the Middle East, Israel.’
The article is not available online (at least so far), however, my lovely sister Robin was very generous to type it for me. It is worth reading to see why Playboy is now blacklisted and tagged “anti-Semite”:
Israel Shouldn’t Get a Free Pass: Real Debate Is Not Anti-Semetic
By Jonathan Tasini - Playboy magazine
Why can’t American Jews, particularly liberal Jews, think straight about Israel? American Jews can easily condemn the war in and occupation of Iraq, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the violations of civil rights there. Yet the same passion for peace, justice and human rights is muted when it comes to talking about unpleasant activities in the Israeli government. American Jews and many politicians who pander for Jewish votes are hurting Israel and the cause of peace by refusing to have an honest debate about our country’s historically one-sided position vis-a-vis Israel and the Middle East conflict. An honest debate is underway within Israel itself, but in the US it’s impossible to be critical of Israel without being labeled anti-Semitic or worse.
Before I dive further into this, I should establish my bona fides for making this argument, which itself says alot about the terrain. I am a Jew. My father was born in what was then Palestine and fought in Israel’s war of independence. My father’s cousin was killed in that war. I lived in Israel for seven years, including the period of the 1973 Yom Kippur war. A cousin of mine was killed in that war, leaving behind a widow and two children. My step-grandfather, an ikd nab wgi was no threat to anyone was killed by a Palestinian who took an axe to his head while he was sitting quietly on a park bench. His murder was revenge for the massacre of dozens of peaceful Muslims the day before, slaughtered by an ultra-nationalist Israeli soldier as they knelt in prayer.
I care about Israel as I care about our country, but I wish to speak the truth about it. In 2006, when I ran in the New York Democratic primary for Senator because of incumbent Hillary Clinton’s support for the Iraq war, my campaign coincided with Israel’s bombing of Lebanon, a move triggered by the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers. While campaigning I said that Israel had committed acts that violated the Geneva Conventions and international standards. Within an hour reporters from all four New York daily papers called me, alerted to my comments by my opponent’s operatives. Betraying their bias, the reporters had no idea my position would not be considered novel or radical in Israel where the country’s conduct in the war was a topic of hot debate. Indeed, the reporters need only have consulted Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem.
Referring to last summer’s Lebanon bombing, B Tselem’s website states, “International humanitarian law…requires that the combating sides direct their attacks only against specific military objectives, take cautionary measures to prevent injury to civilians and refrain from disproportionate attacks, ie., attacks directed against legitimate targets but that are likely to cause excessive harm to civilians. Over the past week Israel has killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians in its attacks against targets in Lebanon. There is a concern that at least some of them were disproportionate attacks, which constitute war crimes”.
Here are some other inconvenient truths. Israel is holding 1,000 Palestinians in administrative detention where, according to B’Tselem, they are exposed to “moderate pressure”, a euphuism for torture. And while six Israeli soldiers and 17 civilians died last year, the Israeli military killed 660 Palestinians, roughly half of them innocent bystanders. So why is there such a lack of debate in the US?
Jews and non-Jews who can easily tell foreigners that being American is not the same as supporting the American government are incapable of making the same argument in Israel’s case. Elected officials won’t say anything because of the political cost or at least the perceived threat from Jewish voters. And there is residue from the Cold War, when Israel was seen as the region’s bulwark against the Soviet Union. Among Jews there is a reflexive “Israel right or wrong” attitude that is deeply rooted in the memory of the Holocaust. My own family lost people in the Holocaust. But the Holocaust should not be used as a moral shield to suppress honest criticism of Israel.
It’s also important to acknowledge that some critics of Israel undercut their own positions by painting a caricature of the country. Israel is a democracy, and like all democracies it has its flaws Nut the open debate heard in Israel is rarely heard in the regions’s other countries, most of which are ruled by dictators or generals. Israel has a very free rambunctious press” can the same be said about Egypt or Syria? Israel’s attorney general recently went after the country’s president for sexual harassment. We can’t even get Congress, not to mention the attorney general, to investigate the president for lying about a war.
These facts make Israel’s conduct even more troubling. The country’s democratic principles and societal fabric are being undermined by its role as an occupier. People who refuse to criticize Israel because of friendship are no friends to Israel. A true friend would not have stood by and remained silent as Israel dropped thousands of cluster bombs in Lebanon, leaving a million unexploded bomblets-small devices the size of a light socket that are still killing and injuring civilians-littered throughout the southern part of the country. A true friend would have taken Israel’s leaders to the woodshed and said, “Responding to Hezbollah is one thing, but turning Lebanon into rubble and embittering a new generation toward the existence of your country is madness”. Instead, politicians like Joe Lieberman and Clinton actually encouraged the bombing by uttering vigorous endorsements of Israel’s right to defend itself. A friend of Israel would not try to fan fears y tarring as anti-Semitic people who are critical of U.S. Middle East policy. Criticism of Israel may be painful to American Jews, but it is high time anyone, Jew or non-Jew, were able to raise questions about our one-sided policy without fear of a McCarthy like smear. A friend would argue strenuously that Israel’s moral fiber and security are weakened every moment it allows the so-called separation barrier in the West Bank to stand, in violation of international law. Whether Jews like the comparison or not, Jimmy Carter is correct in his book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid when he describes the control over Palestinian’s movements as similar to South Africa’s apartheid system.
As a Jew, I have always been proud of the Jewish concept of tikkun olam, which means roughly,”repairing the world.” I like to think it is hat brought so many Jews into the civil rights and labor movements in the 60’s and 70’s and in to the current antiwar movement. I feel great sorrow that Israel is an occupier of another people, and I believe Israel can never be whole or at peace until that occupation is ended in a just way. I also believe tikkun olam means we must never be silent.
(The article also has some pictures of destroyed houses, three pictures, but no captions so you can’t tell if it’s Lebanon or the Occupied Territories - Robin)
Because of the above, apparently Playboy is now “anti-Semitic” according to CAMERA. As Robin said: “It won’t be long before Sesame Street does SOMETHING to get on their nerves too!!“

Why can’t American Jews, particularly liberal Jews, think straight about Israel? American Jews can easily condemn the war in and occupation of Iraq, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the violations of civil rights there. Yet the same passion for peace, justice and human rights is muted when it comes to talking about unpleasant activities in the Israeli government. American Jews and many politicians who pander for Jewish votes are hurting Israel and the cause of peace by refusing to have an honest debate about our country’s historically one-sided position vis-a-vis Israel and the Middle East conflict. An honest debate is underway within Israel itself, but in the US it’s impossible to be critical of Israel without being labeled anti-Semitic or worse.
Do you like - Playboy Magazine, goes Anti-Semitic!? -
Article Tags>> 







October 3rd, 2007 at 1:57 am
[...] blogger Haitham Sabbah claims that Playboy is now being slanted as anti-semitic. Share [...]
October 3rd, 2007 at 2:54 am
Playboy is anti-semitic?
Who would have thunk?
I guess that anyone who thought that the Zionists were wrong were anti-semitic.
Nothing mentioned here who was anti-Jew!
Can we clarify this position?
Born a Jew whose grandmother gave up her faith in 1948 because of Zionists actions.
Now, not a Jew because of my grandmother.
Zionism is the root cause of the problems in the Middle East.
Give me all your arguments and reasons for the settlements to stay in occupied lands, and you are wrong.
Zionism is wrong!
The Jewish faith is a gentle faith just like the Muslim faith.
Once you mix politics into this discussion, every thing will fall apart!
Why can’t the people talk without politics being involved?
BECAUSE the Zionists use force to keep lands that they have stolen.
If Playboy says that the Zionists are wrong.
Who is next?
Well, I am!
October 3rd, 2007 at 3:06 am
I saw an episode of sesame street many years ago where this blue hairy monster went on a 2 hour rant about Palestinian statehood. He was sued for being anti-semetic and driven to insanity.
Now the only thing he seems to want are cookies.
October 3rd, 2007 at 4:47 am
this is interesting!
October 3rd, 2007 at 9:24 am
Oh this is SO ridiculous!! CAMERA is just PROVING exactly what Jonathan
Tasini said, but they are so PROGRAMMED to react to a “percieved allergen” as if in anaphylactic shock each time anyone even HINTS at anything besides the hardline non-peace seeking position they spout. What a total tither they must have been in, as Kimmy said, “Playboy, who would have thunk?”
In fact-JBlog is so OH MY, NOT Playboy lathered up they couldn’t even title their own post about it correctly: “Playboy’s Anti-Israel Propaganda: You Can’t the Magazine For The Articles Anymore”
http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1006499
What’s that JBlog? You Can’t WHAT? the Magazine For the Articles Any More? Maybe we should have a contest to “fill in the blank”! If they correct it, don’t let them fool you, that IS what the title reads.
Yid with a Lid has the title right, http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/10/playboys-anti-israel-propaganda-you.html but in need of an epipen for his own case of hives writes:
“You ask any guy over 40 why they read Playboy they will give you the same answer..for the articles….(Yid’s “middle aged”) As Hef continues to be overtaken by feebleness (or exhaustion from having 3 live-in girlfriends) and the rest of us pass middle age the quality of the non picture part of Playboy has suffered. We can no longer claim to look at Playboy just for the articles. In the latest Issue, for
example they published an article that would have never gotten past Hef when he had all of his marbles.”
Oh yeh? Only Hef “without his marbles” would have let this one slip by? Typical personal attack. Well, Yid, then STOP looking if the articles aren’t up to your snuff, even if you did NOT say the quality of the pictures has lessened. What a fill in the blank!
Also, if you go to the CAMERA article link above where it states that Carter’s book has been debunked and link to the first link, you will come to an article which among other things states:
“Anti-Israel activists claim that Israel is an apartheid state because Palestinian Arabs don’t have the same rights as Israelis. This is akin to saying that the United States is an apartheid state because Mexican citizens don’t have the same rights as American citizens and aren’t allowed to automatically live and work in America. Palestinian Arabs who live in the West Bank and Gaza are citizens of the Palestinian Authority. They are not citizens of Israel and therefore they do not enjoy the same rights and privileges.”
Well you can say that again that Palestinians living in the OT don’t have the same rights as Israeli citizens (which even if they were citizens of Israel would NOT have the same rights as Jewish Israelis)But wait a minute, does the United States ILLEGALLY OCCUPY Mexico? The logic in these arguements that CAMERA and their ilk offer is NON EXISTANT, slanderous and full of just plain untruths.
Playboy DOES have a history of some of the best writers there are writing some of the best articles. In fact, this article by Tasini shares part of a page with another excellent article by John Dean, “Defeating Dysfunction”-the Author of Broken Government Urges Presidential Candidates to Fix Washington’s Fouled Up System.” I find this IRONIC, because Tasini is writing about there being no debate about Israel within the so-called progressive Jewish community here and very LITTLE debate which affects change towards Israel by our government. I can’t say I totally agree with Tasini on this because from my own perspective, I see some of the hardest hitting criticism of Israel coming out of the American Jewish community. However our government IS broken due in large part to our unmitigated support of Israel NO MATTER WHAT.
Bravo to Playboy for publishing this article, and welcome to the club which contains any one and every one who DARES to speak the truth about Israel and gets hog slop slung at them in return.
October 3rd, 2007 at 10:21 am
Thank you for PROVING that some people DO read Playboy for the articles
October 3rd, 2007 at 10:26 am
BTW… I’m ‘borrowing’ this post for my blog…thanks.
October 5th, 2007 at 3:54 am
Robin,
I do read Playboy for the articles.
My wife likes the articles.
Penthouse, forget it.
We both like the articles.
As for the pictures?
We would rather look at each other.
Not a pretty picture, but mutual love.
October 5th, 2007 at 7:14 am
Kimmy,
I know the articles are good in Playboy Kimmy, I didn’t say that, the dummies from CAMERA are saying that Playboy is not worth buying anymore since they published this article. I was making fun of them (CAMERA) because they are SO ridiculous.