<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playboy Magazine, goes Anti-Semitic!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/</link>
	<description>Because Silence is Complicity!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334620</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334620</guid>
		<description>Kimmy,
I know the articles are good in Playboy Kimmy, I didn&#039;t say that, the dummies from CAMERA are saying that Playboy is not worth buying anymore since they published this article.  I was making fun of them (CAMERA) because they are SO ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimmy,<br />
I know the articles are good in Playboy Kimmy, I didn&#8217;t say that, the dummies from CAMERA are saying that Playboy is not worth buying anymore since they published this article.  I was making fun of them (CAMERA) because they are SO ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmy</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334617</link>
		<dc:creator>kimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334617</guid>
		<description>Robin,
I do read Playboy for the articles.
My wife likes the articles.
Penthouse, forget it.
We both like the articles.
As for the pictures?
We would rather look at each other.
Not a pretty picture, but mutual love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,<br />
I do read Playboy for the articles.<br />
My wife likes the articles.<br />
Penthouse, forget it.<br />
We both like the articles.<br />
As for the pictures?<br />
We would rather look at each other.<br />
Not a pretty picture, but mutual love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desertpeace</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334482</link>
		<dc:creator>desertpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334482</guid>
		<description>BTW... I&#039;m &#039;borrowing&#039; this post for my blog...thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW&#8230; I&#8217;m &#8216;borrowing&#8217; this post for my blog&#8230;thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desertpeace</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334473</link>
		<dc:creator>desertpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334473</guid>
		<description>Thank you for PROVING that some people DO read Playboy for the articles ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for PROVING that some people DO read Playboy for the articles ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334433</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334433</guid>
		<description>Oh this is SO ridiculous!! CAMERA is just PROVING exactly what Jonathan 
Tasini said, but they are so PROGRAMMED to react to a &quot;percieved allergen&quot; as if in anaphylactic shock each time anyone even HINTS at anything besides the hardline non-peace seeking position they spout.  What a total tither they must have been in, as Kimmy said, &quot;Playboy, who would have thunk?&quot; 
 
In fact-JBlog is so OH MY, NOT Playboy lathered up they couldn&#039;t even title their own post about it correctly: &quot;Playboy&#039;s Anti-Israel Propaganda: You Can&#039;t the Magazine For The Articles Anymore&quot;  
http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1006499 
 
What&#039;s that JBlog? You Can&#039;t WHAT? the Magazine For the Articles Any More?  Maybe we should have a contest to &quot;fill in the blank&quot;! If they correct it, don&#039;t let them fool you, that IS what the title reads.
 
Yid with a Lid has the title right, http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/10/playboys-anti-israel-propaganda-you.html  but in need of an epipen for his own case of hives writes: 

&quot;You ask any guy over 40 why they read Playboy they will give you the same answer..for the articles....(Yid&#039;s &quot;middle aged&quot;) As Hef continues to be overtaken by feebleness (or exhaustion from having 3 live-in girlfriends) and the rest of us pass middle age the quality of the non picture part of Playboy has suffered. We can no longer claim to look at Playboy just for the articles. In the latest Issue, for 
example they published an article that would have never gotten past Hef when he had all of his marbles.&quot; 

Oh yeh? Only Hef &quot;without his marbles&quot; would have let this one slip by? Typical personal attack.  Well, Yid, then STOP looking if the articles aren&#039;t up to your snuff, even if you did NOT say the quality of the pictures has lessened.  What a fill in the blank! 

Also, if you go to the CAMERA article link above where it states that Carter&#039;s book has been debunked and link to the first link, you will come to an article which among other things states:

&quot;Anti-Israel activists claim that Israel is an apartheid state because Palestinian Arabs don&#039;t have the same rights as Israelis. This is akin to saying that the United States is an apartheid state because Mexican citizens don&#039;t have the same rights as American citizens and aren&#039;t allowed to automatically live and work in America. Palestinian Arabs who live in the West Bank and Gaza are citizens of the Palestinian Authority. They are not citizens of Israel and therefore they do not enjoy the same rights and privileges.&quot;

Well you can say that again that Palestinians living in the OT don&#039;t have the same rights as Israeli citizens (which even if they were citizens of Israel would NOT have the same rights as Jewish Israelis)But wait a minute, does the United States ILLEGALLY OCCUPY Mexico?  The logic in these arguements that CAMERA and their ilk offer is NON EXISTANT, slanderous and full of just plain untruths.

Playboy DOES have a history of some of the best writers there are writing some of the best articles.  In fact, this article by Tasini shares part of a page with another excellent article by John Dean, &quot;Defeating Dysfunction&quot;-the Author of Broken Government Urges Presidential Candidates to Fix Washington&#039;s Fouled Up System.&quot; I find this IRONIC, because Tasini is writing about there being no debate about Israel within the so-called progressive Jewish community here and very LITTLE debate which affects change towards Israel by our government.  I can&#039;t say I totally agree with Tasini on this because from my own perspective, I see some of the hardest hitting criticism of Israel coming out of the American Jewish community.  However our government IS broken due in large part to our unmitigated support of Israel NO MATTER WHAT.

Bravo to Playboy for publishing this article, and welcome to the club which contains any one and every one who DARES to speak the truth about Israel and gets hog slop slung at them in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh this is SO ridiculous!! CAMERA is just PROVING exactly what Jonathan<br />
Tasini said, but they are so PROGRAMMED to react to a &#8220;percieved allergen&#8221; as if in anaphylactic shock each time anyone even HINTS at anything besides the hardline non-peace seeking position they spout.  What a total tither they must have been in, as Kimmy said, &#8220;Playboy, who would have thunk?&#8221; </p>
<p>In fact-JBlog is so OH MY, NOT Playboy lathered up they couldn&#8217;t even title their own post about it correctly: &#8220;Playboy&#8217;s Anti-Israel Propaganda: You Can&#8217;t the Magazine For The Articles Anymore&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1006499" rel="nofollow">http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1006499</a> </p>
<p>What&#8217;s that JBlog? You Can&#8217;t WHAT? the Magazine For the Articles Any More?  Maybe we should have a contest to &#8220;fill in the blank&#8221;! If they correct it, don&#8217;t let them fool you, that IS what the title reads.</p>
<p>Yid with a Lid has the title right, <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/10/playboys-anti-israel-propaganda-you.html" rel="nofollow">http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/10/playboys-anti-israel-propaganda-you.html</a>  but in need of an epipen for his own case of hives writes: </p>
<p>&#8220;You ask any guy over 40 why they read Playboy they will give you the same answer..for the articles&#8230;.(Yid&#8217;s &#8220;middle aged&#8221;) As Hef continues to be overtaken by feebleness (or exhaustion from having 3 live-in girlfriends) and the rest of us pass middle age the quality of the non picture part of Playboy has suffered. We can no longer claim to look at Playboy just for the articles. In the latest Issue, for<br />
example they published an article that would have never gotten past Hef when he had all of his marbles.&#8221; </p>
<p>Oh yeh? Only Hef &#8220;without his marbles&#8221; would have let this one slip by? Typical personal attack.  Well, Yid, then STOP looking if the articles aren&#8217;t up to your snuff, even if you did NOT say the quality of the pictures has lessened.  What a fill in the blank! </p>
<p>Also, if you go to the CAMERA article link above where it states that Carter&#8217;s book has been debunked and link to the first link, you will come to an article which among other things states:</p>
<p>&#8220;Anti-Israel activists claim that Israel is an apartheid state because Palestinian Arabs don&#8217;t have the same rights as Israelis. This is akin to saying that the United States is an apartheid state because Mexican citizens don&#8217;t have the same rights as American citizens and aren&#8217;t allowed to automatically live and work in America. Palestinian Arabs who live in the West Bank and Gaza are citizens of the Palestinian Authority. They are not citizens of Israel and therefore they do not enjoy the same rights and privileges.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well you can say that again that Palestinians living in the OT don&#8217;t have the same rights as Israeli citizens (which even if they were citizens of Israel would NOT have the same rights as Jewish Israelis)But wait a minute, does the United States ILLEGALLY OCCUPY Mexico?  The logic in these arguements that CAMERA and their ilk offer is NON EXISTANT, slanderous and full of just plain untruths.</p>
<p>Playboy DOES have a history of some of the best writers there are writing some of the best articles.  In fact, this article by Tasini shares part of a page with another excellent article by John Dean, &#8220;Defeating Dysfunction&#8221;-the Author of Broken Government Urges Presidential Candidates to Fix Washington&#8217;s Fouled Up System.&#8221; I find this IRONIC, because Tasini is writing about there being no debate about Israel within the so-called progressive Jewish community here and very LITTLE debate which affects change towards Israel by our government.  I can&#8217;t say I totally agree with Tasini on this because from my own perspective, I see some of the hardest hitting criticism of Israel coming out of the American Jewish community.  However our government IS broken due in large part to our unmitigated support of Israel NO MATTER WHAT.</p>
<p>Bravo to Playboy for publishing this article, and welcome to the club which contains any one and every one who DARES to speak the truth about Israel and gets hog slop slung at them in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yazan ashqar</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334428</link>
		<dc:creator>yazan ashqar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334428</guid>
		<description>this is interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nas</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334423</link>
		<dc:creator>Nas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334423</guid>
		<description>I saw an episode of sesame street many years ago where this blue hairy monster went on a 2 hour rant about Palestinian statehood. He was sued for being anti-semetic and driven to insanity.

Now the only thing he seems to want are cookies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an episode of sesame street many years ago where this blue hairy monster went on a 2 hour rant about Palestinian statehood. He was sued for being anti-semetic and driven to insanity.</p>
<p>Now the only thing he seems to want are cookies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmy</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334422</link>
		<dc:creator>kimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334422</guid>
		<description>Playboy is anti-semitic?
Who would have thunk?
I guess that anyone who thought that the Zionists were wrong were anti-semitic.
Nothing mentioned here who was anti-Jew!
Can we clarify this position?
Born a Jew whose grandmother gave up her faith in 1948 because of Zionists actions.
Now, not a Jew because of my grandmother.
Zionism is the root cause of the problems in the Middle East.
Give me all your arguments and reasons for the settlements to stay in occupied lands, and you are wrong.
Zionism is wrong!
The Jewish faith is a gentle faith just like the Muslim faith.
Once you mix politics into this discussion, every thing will fall apart!
Why can&#039;t the people talk without politics being involved?
BECAUSE the Zionists use force to keep lands that they have stolen.
If Playboy says that the Zionists are wrong.
Who is next?
Well, I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playboy is anti-semitic?<br />
Who would have thunk?<br />
I guess that anyone who thought that the Zionists were wrong were anti-semitic.<br />
Nothing mentioned here who was anti-Jew!<br />
Can we clarify this position?<br />
Born a Jew whose grandmother gave up her faith in 1948 because of Zionists actions.<br />
Now, not a Jew because of my grandmother.<br />
Zionism is the root cause of the problems in the Middle East.<br />
Give me all your arguments and reasons for the settlements to stay in occupied lands, and you are wrong.<br />
Zionism is wrong!<br />
The Jewish faith is a gentle faith just like the Muslim faith.<br />
Once you mix politics into this discussion, every thing will fall apart!<br />
Why can&#8217;t the people talk without politics being involved?<br />
BECAUSE the Zionists use force to keep lands that they have stolen.<br />
If Playboy says that the Zionists are wrong.<br />
Who is next?<br />
Well, I am!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Palestine: Playboy Anti-Semitic?</title>
		<link>http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334415</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Palestine: Playboy Anti-Semitic?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/10/03/playboy-magazine-goes-anti-semitic/#comment-334415</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger Haitham Sabbah claims that Playboy  is now being slanted as anti-semitic.   Share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger Haitham Sabbah claims that Playboy  is now being slanted as anti-semitic.   Share [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

