By Maidhc Ó Cathail* | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.biz
It would be hard to think of anyone who has done more to undermine American freedoms than Joseph Lieberman.
Since 9/11, the Independent senator from Connecticut has introduced a raft of legislation in the name of the "global war on terror" which has steadily eroded constitutional rights. If the United States looks increasingly like a police state, Senator Lieberman has to take much of the credit for it.
On October 11, 2001, exactly one month after 9/11, Lieberman introduced S. 1534, a bill to establish a Department of Homeland Security. Since then, he has been the main mover behind such draconian legislation as the Protect America Act of 2007, the Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, and the proposed Terrorist Expatriation Act, which would revoke the citizenship of Americans suspected of terrorism. And now the senator from Connecticut wants to kill the Internet.
According to the bill he recently proposed in the Senate, the entire global internet is to be claimed as a "national asset" of the United States. If Congress passes the bill, the US President would be given the power to "kill" the internet in the event of a "national cyber-emergency." Supporters of the legislation say this is necessary to prevent a "cyber 9/11" – yet another myth from the fearmongers who brought us tales of "Iraqi WMD" and "Iranian nukes."
Lieberman's concerns about the internet are not new. The United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which Lieberman chairs, released a report in 2008 titled "Violent Islamist Extremism, The Internet, and the Homegrown Terrorist Threat." The report claimed that groups like al-Qaeda use the internet to indoctrinate and recruit members, and to communicate with each other.
Immediately after the report was published, Lieberman asked Google, the parent company of You Tube, to "immediately remove content produced by Islamist terrorist organizations." That might sound like a reasonable request. However, as far as Lieberman is concerned, Hamas, Hezbollah and even the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are terrorist organizations.
It's hardly surprising that Lieberman's views on what constitute terrorism parallel those of Tel Aviv. As Mark Vogel, chairman of the largest pro-Israel Political Action Committee (PAC) in the United States, once said: "Joe Lieberman, without exception, no conditions … is the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in Congress. There is nobody who does more on behalf of Israel than Joe Lieberman."
Lieberman has been well-rewarded for his patriotism – to another country. In the past six years, he has been the Senate's top recipient of political contributions from pro-Israel PACs with a staggering $1,226,956.
But what is it that bothers Lieberman so much about the internet? Could it be that it allows ordinary Americans access to facts which reveal exactly what kind of "friend" Israel has been to its overgenerous benefactor? Facts which they have been denied by the pro-Israel mainstream media.
How much faith would American voters have in the likes of Lieberman, who claims that the Jewish state is their greatest ally, if they knew that Israeli agents planted firebombs in American installations in Egypt in 1954 in an attempt to undermine relations between Nasser and the United States; that Israel murdered 34 American servicemen in a deliberate attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967; that Israeli espionage, most notably Jonathan Pollard's spying, has done tremendous damage to American interests; that five Mossad agents were filming and celebrating as the Twin Towers collapsed on September 11, 2001; that Tel Aviv and its accomplices in Washington were the source of the false pre-war intelligence on Iraq; and about countless other examples of treachery?
In his latest attempt to censor the internet, does Lieberman really want to protect the American people from imaginary cyber-terrorists? Or is he just trying to protect his treasonous cronies from the American people?
*Maidhc Ó Cathail is a widely published writer based in Japan.
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
*Maidhc Ó Cathail,
Dear Sir,
You couldn’t have chosen a more interesting and informative subject than the self-proclaimed “protector of Israel.” This role of his was quoted in the July issue of The Washimngton Report on Middle East AFfair. If only the voters of CT would invoke his words to begin impeachment procedings against “Holy Joe” the world would be a much better place and CT would begin a recovery from his sickness of racist/zionist warmongering.
Sadly to say, the richest racist/zionists live in this once-great state and they can buy all the elections as they have done many times for Joseph Isidore. I worked for Ned Lamont in the last senatorial election and while Lamont beat Lieberman in the primary, the fat cats used their money to win the election and since CT is controlled by racist/zionists of Lieberman’s ilk he has no opposition. It’s also sad that Lamont who’s running for governor will probably be defeated ONLY because he dared to challenge Lieberman.
I would dearly love to see this state turn around and not allow racist/zionism to rule.
Again, many thanks for your article.
Best Regards
Maryam Fritsch
I agree..IM wondering why these ugly, corrupt, skinny, lying perverts, deceived, selfish human garbage trash get away with Murder..Where are the hitmen???
{ 5 trackbacks }