America’s Worst Kept Secret
By Gordon Duff* | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.biz
"MR. PRESIDENT, THE FIRST PLANE HAS HIT ON SCHEDULE"
An Israel film crew, found later to be Mossad agents, partied in the streets, having filmed the attacks. They couldn’t control their joy in seeing thousands of Americans die. The equipment gathered up days in advance, cameras loaded the night before.
Hours before the attack, they began their drive, selecting the perfect spot, setting up their cameras and perhaps some other electronic equipment as well. Their rationale, “We were there to film the planes crashing into the World Trade Center.”
“God bless us all,” those news people are clever ones, prescient to a fault.
Nearly a decade later, rigged elections, phony wars, more CIA drug dealing, economic thievery beyond imagination, accusations of war crimes and more, so much more, faith has been lost in every American institution. Nothing can be trusted, least of all the American government.
The one truth stands out beyond all others. 9/11 was a combined operation between Israel’s Mossad and rogue groups in America including the leadership of the White House, Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA. It is called a truth because this is where the evidence leads and with it public opinion.
If evidence can’t all be destroyed and public opinion controlled then both evidence and public opinion can be “exiled.” Thus, a news blackout for 9 years has descended over the US, blocking all reporting of alternative theories on 9/11 with the same vigor used to block questions about Israel’s nuclear weapons.
It worked for the Soviet Union, will it work for America? Can a government and press alliance, only possible in a dictatorship, exile reality, sending it to a veritable Siberia, replacing it with myth?
Is the real America a dictatorship?
All rational judgement based on forensic evidence, testimony and documentation leads no other possible direction. It is science, it is law, it is reason. Any other assumption is myth, conspiracy theory but most of all, treason. There is little left in Washington anymore but treason, treason and silence.
Do Americans really believe this, is this how they think? If this is true, then why is nothing done, no general strikes, no marches on Washington? Is there also proof that Americans have lost so much confidence in themselves and each other that no change that isn’t “Fox News approved” can hope to succeed?
Do Americans feel powerless and humiliated? Is this why so many troops returning from war are killing themselves?
It is estimated that the current “off year” elections will cost 1.2 billion dollars. Half of that money will come from sources tied to narcotics smuggling from Afghanistan and Mexico and much of the rest will be from arms, oil and insurance industries. The most powerful nation in the history of earth continues to fail in two areas, the endless stream of narcotics coming into America from Mexico and the massive seasonal increases in opium/heroin production in Afghanistan despite billion dollar “eradication” efforts.
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it is fact.
With talk about Koran burnings organized by Fox News and how angry the world’s 1.2 billion Muslims will be, we see that number again, why is the myth of 9/11, the staged attack on America by Israel and their paid Washington lackeys, so important to sell? Why is the American government so afraid of the American people, why if America is really a democracy?
There is a reason.
People simply don’t believe the lies anymore. How do we know this? Did we read it in the papers or hear it on television. Think about it. “A poll today indicated that 74% of Americans no longer accept the findings of the 9/11 Commission.” Actually, you will never hear that because we can’t discuss the findings of the 9/11 Commission.
There was a report, one rescinded by most of the members, but the findings themselves were something else. Findings are facts, a “report” is what was said, not what was proven, not what was true, not even what was possible.
The Commission found that it had not been allowed to investigate properly, that evidence had been withheld and that crimes were committed by government and military leaders including, not only the destruction of evidence but perjured testimony. The findings of the 9/11 Commission were simple, they found evidence of a criminal conspiracy that prevented an honest investigation.
Those are the findings.
The findings were not published though they were announced, written of in books, articles, speeches were made but the findings are a problem. The findings “found” those that had empowered the Commission were criminals. Is it possible to define a conflict of interest more clearly than this?
Buy our Products | Sponsor us:
How about the “court of public opinion.” Let us define “public opinion.” We know this, at one point, several years ago, 65% of Europeans believed that 9/11 was an “inside job,” meaning that the Bush administration was complicit in the planning and execution of 9/11.
That number is much higher today, estimated at 80%.
The question, however, has never been asked in the United States. Do 65% of Americans believe that 9/11 is was an inside job? Maybe. I think the falling poll numbers of George W. Bush were always based on 9/11 and the belief by some Americans he was complicit. CBS followed Bush popularity ratings and found some startling evidence of a mysterious and inexplicable mistrust many Americans developed after 9/11 and the Iraq War began to fall apart. President Jimmie Carter left office with an approval rating twice that of Bush, even while Iranians held 52 Americans hostage.
(CBS) President Bush will leave office as one of the most unpopular departing presidents in history, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll showing Mr. Bush’s final approval rating at 22 percent.
Seventy-three percent say they disapprove of the way Mr. Bush has handled his job as president over the last eight years.
Mr. Bush’s final approval rating is the lowest final rating for an outgoing president since Gallup began asking about presidential approval more than 70 years ago.The rating is far below the final ratings of recent two-term presidents Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, who both ended their terms with a 68 percent approval rating, according to CBS News polling.Recent one term presidents also had higher ratings than Mr. Bush. His father George H.W. Bush had an end-of-term rating of 54 percent, while Jimmy Carter’s rating was 44 percent.
Harry Truman had previously had the lowest end-of-term approval at 32 percent, as measured by Gallup.
Views of Mr. Bush’s popularity are highly partisan. Only 6 percent of Democrats approve of the job he has done as president, while 57 percent of Republicans approve. Eighteen percent of independents approve.
Interestingly, Mr. Bush also has the distinction of having the highest approval rating for a president, as well as the lowest.
In November 2008, just before the presidential election, only 20 percent approved of the job he was doing as president – the lowest of any president since Gallup began asking the question in 1938.
But Mr. Bush enjoyed a high approval rating of 90 percent – the highest of any president – following the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001.
With total control of the press and the “Mission Accomplished” victory in Iraq under his belt, the execution of Saddam Hussein and the full and total backing of the oil, defense and financial sectors of the economy, the American people mistrusted Bush like no other person in their history.
There is no other explanation than 9/11. Bush popularity/disapproval ratings were tied to his personal credibility in two areas, Iraq and 9/11. There was no public outcry over the invasion of Iraq but there may well have been a public outcry over treason involving 9/11. There is no other explanation possible.
It isn’t “conclusive proof” but it is certainly beyond reasonable doubt. No wonder the media in the United States avoids asking hard questions about 9/11.
With only most recent trends bringing Israeli complicity in the planning and execution to the forefront, the ‘Dancing Israelis,” the Larry Silverstein admissions and recent revelations of Mossad sponsored terrorism, empirical evidence of a strong public outcry against Israel doesn’t exist. The same, however, can’t be made for President Bush, Vice President Cheney and their closest associates and advisers.
Only one possible thing could bring a 90% approval rating down to 22%.
By 2009, 78% of Americans believed that President Bush was responsible for 9/11, either directly or indirectly. How many simply believe Bush was “asleep at the switch?” How many believe something more? Is the most common belief that he had foreknowledge and chose to do nothing?
Is the media frenzy, even to the point of endangering our troops in the field, a admission that 9/11 treason may blow America apart? Is this why President Obama has kept so many of the illegal Bush security protocols in place? Is this why a “kill switch” has been installed on the internet and a “conspiracy czar” has been appointed by President Obama, one who has openly stated”
“attempts by conspiracy theorists to tie Israel to 9/11 are the greatest security threats to the United States”…..Cass Sunstein, Obama Regulatory Czar.
September 2001, 90% – January 2009, 22%
Were the numbers to have crashed when the economy tanked in 2007 it would be one thing. Bush was down in the 20% range in 2006. Were people to hate Bush as they did Nixon or see him as ineffective as they did with Carter, this could also be a rationale. Neither factor applies, there is little question of this. Even those who most strongly disapproved of Bush never found him indecisive.
What is clear is one thing and one thing only, trust, not just minor suspicions of lack of ability or political game-playing.
The suspicion is clear. A majority of Americans suspect President Bush may have been involved in treason.
Ask this question anywhere in the world, Europe, Canada, Latin America or the Middle East, even ask it in Japan. The truth, the only truth available to Americans, is that they are not that different than the rest of the world. America is not a nation of fools or dupes.
They are simply reported that way.
* Gordon Duff is senior editor of Veterans Today.
Get updates in your inbox - FREE!
George W. Bush was the “stunt double” for the real US President, whether that was Dick Cheney or someone else. Notice how no one in GWB’s entourage on 9/11 even cared what GWB might have to say about the situation. Andrew Card told him the second plane had hit but did not wait for a response. NO ONE in the entourage expected GWB to make a decision. No one asked GWB what to do. The Secret Service did not even try to remove GWB from a public place to a secure location. Instead, GWB spoke to kids and teachers at an elementary school. When he left the school, he went first to one Air Force base, then another, before returning to Washington, DC many hours later. He did not address the country for those many hours, as he could have done from the Air Force bases, if not from Air Force One. He could have spoken to the people using an ordinary cell phone if necessary, not to mention the huge amount of communications equipment that always travels with the President of the United States. During the worst crisis of his presidency, GWB acted like exactly what he is: the alcoholic ne’er-do-well son of a rich and powerful man.
9/11 was an Inside job and Mossad had its hand in it. Those responsible may get away in this life time, but what about the after life? God has created all things and shall not allow the Wicked to go Unpunished.
George W. Bush needs to be arrested,waterboarded,denied his rights of a free,unbias trial,and put in Gitmo Bay for the rest of his corrupt,treasonous life.On the other hand,if “other” people(zionists)want to keep GWB quiet,then those people should leave OUR country without further ado,pay US back for the attack on the USS Liberty,and the attack on the WTC,the death of several thousand troops fighting in the Middle East,and pray for mercy from US attacking Israel.
there’s this modern invention called THE GALLOWS, it uses ROPE, or you can do the other gig called FIRING SQUAD for them all. They all committed TREASON and should either be HANGED OR SHOT after a speedy trial by the victims families. :)
adios Dick, it was nice not knowing your evil zionist ass!! :)
Yes, the evidence does indicate that Bush, Cheney, and elements of DOD, NORAD, and CIA, FAA, and otheres were actively involved in the treason of 9-11.
When I first heard about the planes hitting the WTC, for some ‘strange’ reason, I thought “they’ve done it themselves”! Wonder how many others had that first response thought? Maybe there’s a ‘World Truth Connection’ available on another frequency. The Truth Shall Set You Free!!!
Indeed, 9/11 is America’s Worst Kept Secret. But at the time of the attacks very few people suspected what was going on in reality. The truth became evident only after the telling of many lies that contradicted each other and ultimately cast doubt on the official version of the events.
9/11 is no more, no less than a sinister prelude for the “global war on terror” (see Ali Baba and the Myth of Global War on Terror http://justproportion.wordpress.com/2010/08/06/ali-baba-and-the-myth-of-global-war-on-terror/) that should be understood as an earlier chapter in the establishment of the New World Order (NWO). The present crusade against Islam is the continuation of an earlier plan of creating a “phantom enemy” to sustain the “global war on terror” (see The Phantom of Terrorism and the Rise of the Police State http://justproportion.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/the-phantom-of-terrorism-and-the-rise-of-the-police-state/).
Islam was chosen out of convenience. First of all Islam happens to prevail in countries neighbouring Israel. Second, Israel had laid the groundwork in demonizing Islam long before the attacks of 9/11 (see The Zionist Strategy of Demonizing Islam http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2010/08/15/the-zionist-strategy-of-demonizing-islam/) – it carried the benefit of covering up the atrocities committed against the Palestinians in the name of Greater Israel (see In The Name Of Greater Israel http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2010/03/23/in-the-name-of-greater-israel/).
And finally, according to Chronicle Staff Writer Frank Viviano’s article of September 26, 2001: “The map of terrorist sanctuaries and targets in the Middle East and Central Asia is also, to an extraordinary degree, a map of the world’s principal energy sources in the 21st century. The defence of these energy resources – rather than a simple confrontation between Islam and the West – will be the primary flash point of global conflict for decades to come” (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/26/MN70983.DTL).
A similar approach is taken by George Monbiot in his article of October 23, 2001 published in The Guardian: “Afghanistan has some oil and gas of its own, but not enough to qualify as a major strategic concern. Its northern neighbours, by contrast, contain reserves which could be critical to future global supply. In 1998, Dick Cheney, now US vice-president but then chief executive of a major oil services company, remarked: ‘I cannot think of a time when we have had a region emerge as suddenly to become as strategically significant as the Caspian’. But the oil and gas there is worthless until it is moved. The only route which makes both political and economic sense is through Afghanistan” (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/oct/23/afghanistan.terrorism11).
According Andrew Gavin Marshall, the “crossover between terrorism and oil and gas reserves of vital importance to the United States and the West are Saudi Arabia, Libya, Bahrain, the Gulf Emirates, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan and Algeria, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Georgia and eastern Turkey (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686). The same region accounts for more than 65% of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies. Thus “It is inevitable that the war against terrorism will be seen by many as a war on behalf of America’s Chevron, ExxonMobil and Arco; France’s TotalFinaElf; British Petroleum; Royal Dutch Shell and other multinational giants, which have hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in the region” (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/26/MN70983.DTL).
In the late 1990s Palestinians made a deal with the British Gas. A year of drilling in the Mediterranean Sea, off the coast of the Gaza Strip, was rewarded – the newly discovered oil reserves promised to provide economic freedom and stability. Israel, of course, didn’t like the idea. In 2005 Israel chose to import natural gas from Egypt that dealt a major blow to Palestinian hopes (http://www.oilandgasinvestingglossary.com/palestines_natural_gas_troubles.asp). After the Israeli deal with Egypt, British Gas attempted to export natural gas through a Gaza-E Arish pipeline. This latest attempt was disrupted by the British Government (http://www.oilandgasinvestingglossary.com/palestines_natural_gas_troubles.asp).
The invasion of Iraq had as much to do with Saddam’s removal from power as it had with oil. In the summer of 2001, Dick Cheney convened a set of “highly secret meetings,” known as the Energy Task Force. Iraqi oilfields, pipelines refineries, terminals were discussed with top officials from Shell Oil, British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Conoco, and so on. Later, these same companies received major contracts to “develop Iraqi oil” (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686).
Apart from energy reserves, there also is a need of controlling the global economy by contradictory balance between suppressing competition and promoting new markets. In his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller, former National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter, and member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group, outlined a strategy for the U.S. whereby Eurasia is viewed as a “chief geopolitical prize” for America (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686).
Referring to the Central Asian Republics as the “Eurasian Balkans,” Brzezinski wrote that these republics are strategically important to at least “three of their most immediate and more powerful neighbors, namely Russia, Turkey and Iran, with China also signaling an increasing political interest in the region. … But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals, including gold. … It follows that America’s primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space and that the global community has unhindered financial and economic access to it” (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686).
This means that the U.S. policy in the region is geared toward maintaining a strategic position in the name of securing an “economic prize” for “the global community” of multinationals. Preventing the rise of a new superpower in the region helps international financial interests to bring about the New World Order. Brzezinski describes it thus: “To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together” (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686).