ISRAEL’s wars on Gaza have not ceased since Palestinians exercised their free, democratic election in 2006.
The relentless warfare has alternated between bloody and muted, but let’s clarify some distortions.
Contradictory to most Western media reporting, the current escalation was sparked by Israel’s extra judicial assassination of Ahmad Al Jabari, a Hamas military leader – not by rockets fired from Gaza. The targeted killing came 48 hours after an Egyptian-mediated ceasefire between Israel and militant Palestinian organisations.
In fact, news reports three weeks ago indicated that Al Jabari was negotiating a long-term ceasefire with Israel. Moreover, he was instrumental in limiting Hamas’ retaliation to repeated Israeli violations of a previous ceasefire.
So what motivated Israel to violate the latest agreement?
As a militaristic society, Israeli polls show that voters favour a party of war.
A second political objective is pre-empting and reframing US President Barack Obama’s peace agenda during his second term. Meanwhile, a third motive is to distract attention from or delay the Palestinian bid for observer state status at the UN later this month.
On the military level, Zionist warmongers are sacrificing Palestinian and Jewish blood to test the US-financed “Iron Dome” – which protects Israel from incoming rockets using laser-guided missiles – in preparation for their more destructive war with Hizbollah and Iran.
In a week of clashes, American-made and US taxpayer-funded smart weapons have targeted residential areas in Gaza, killing more than 140 Palestinians, with “collateral damage” of mostly innocent women and children.
The current carnage is inseparable from Israel’s 64-year-old violent attempts to subjugate the Palestinian people. Its war crimes are rationalised by the US and most European countries as “self-defence”.
These are the same nations that ostensibly back Arabs’ trot towards democracy, which is beyond hypocritical.
While pontificating on Arabs “embracing democratic values”, the West has been nonchalant towards the inhumane blockade of Gaza or Israeli control over the rest of Palestine.
Occupation is the worst form of rule and, combined with a military siege, is the highest level of aggression.
Another form of aggression is Israel’s silent war manifested in its military-supervised “starvation diet” rationing – through which it controls the entry of food and prevents fishermen in Gaza from accessing 85 per cent of fishery resources at sea.
A study prepared for the United Nations Conference of Trade and Development last September predicted that under current conditions, Gaza would become a “fundamentally unlivable” city by 2020.
Israel’s evils have continued only because the international community remains indifferent to illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and its wicked siege of more than 1.4 million people in Gaza.
This is also possible because Arab governments choose to do very little. Rhetoric, speeches and feel-good visits to Gaza might raise morale. Financial support, if dispensed, is recycled in the never-ending rebuilding process.
But what Gaza needs are deeds to compel Western powers to come to their senses and stop defending Israel’s malevolent policies.
For example, minor tweaking of oil production or delays in delivery lots would be enough to jiggle vulnerable Western economies, forcing leaders to become more attuned to their national interests – not the Israeli lobby.
Any ceasefire must envision a final outcome that includes the halting of all forms of warfare, ending the blockade of Gaza and a halt to building illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank.
Israelis should not continue to enjoy peace while Palestinians suffer under occupation. Reconciliation and repression are incongruent.