By Gordon Duff* | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.biz

Judaic Republic Of Iran?

It is one thing if a spokesman for Bibi Netanyahu's Likudist government had tried this, but it was all the networks and newspapers in America, all carrying the same story, a story, not only inaccurate but an outrageous lie. The story, the translation, was so false, that it should have been a joke were it not being used to try to convince America to attack Iran to "defend" Israel. This is what Ahmadinejad actually said:

"History will erase the Zionism from the sands of time"

Even though misquoted, "Cardboard Lethario" Ahmadinejad isn't hard to pick out, an actor, waiting for cues from his handlers, waiting in the wings, his "Tel Aviv connection." Weak as all these Iranian theatrics may be, they are all Israel has to work with nowadays, that and bottle rockets from Stalag Gaza. Building a holocaust threat out of Israeli mole, Ahmadinejad, isn't even a "cardboard" threat.

Using the same logic, every time someone in Israel washes their clothes, they must call it a "soil and stain holocaust." No, none of it is funny, but not because Jews have been persecuted for centuries but rather because we are learning they have built an industry out of selling their own "victimhood."

Whenever you hear an outrageous attack on Israel or Jews, you can be certain of one thing, it is a "false flag" attack, Jews attacking themselves. With the one of the largest intelligence/terror organizations on earth, 500 times the estimated size of Al Qaeda, and openly operating in over 190 countries worldwide, along with direct control of over 40% of the world's economic resources and hundreds of nuclear weapons, seeming like a victim takes a considerable effort. Think of the kind of "imagineering" required to fool a nation of Jews, half of them Nobel Prize winners, to hide under their beds?

One "self induced" Israeli threat is "holocaust denial."

Managing the holocaust denial movements the same way they dominate the 9/11 Truth movements and the Tea Party, all "field based warfare" tactics, controlling the information age "battlefield," is how Israel plays both sides against the middle. Thus, a candidate now accused of being a "witch" can win a Senate primary for the Tea Party. Her campaign is financed by Zionists but after winning a primary, the same Zionists in their newspapers are the first to turn on her. Why is this? Offer Americans hope for freedom from the two owned and controlled useless political parties. Then smash that hope. Why would anyone hate America that much?

Imagine a 9/11 Truth group that will avoid talking about arrested Israeli agents or the mysterious destruction of building 7 "ordered" by Larry Silverstein but rather chooses to focus on UFOs and useless infighting.

There are more Mossad operatives in "9/11 Truth" than FBI Agents in the 1960s KKK.

Obama "Propaganda Czar" Cass Sunstein, an Israeli -American (if such things can exist) has continually stressed that all "9/11 Truth" groups be seen as "enemies of America." Why do the terms "Israeli-American" and "truth is un-American" used in this context not surprise me?

We wonder why the 140 Israeli's arrested in the US after 9/11 were released almost immediately, many with no questioning at all, and 75% of all Muslims arrested, some detained for many years, have proven to be "mistaken identity." All but a handful of the rest are awaiting release with the government continually filing motions to prevent the public from discovering the abuses tied to their detention and arrest, all without any cause, any evidence or even any reasonable suspicion. Were they Jews, they would have had "extralegal" protections, above and beyond American law.

Does "Holocaustsploitation" help create this environment of lawlessness which may have endangered America?

Israel pushes the focus of holocaust denial into worship of Hitler, not accurate documentation of factual history so that innocent researchers like Ernst Zundel are imprisoned. Historians in Europe, in Canada, face years in prison, not for denying anything but failing to read, word for word, from prepared "talking points" on the holocaust. It is safer putting up a billboard in Saudi Arabia insulting the Prophet (peace be on him) than saying only 5 million Jews died in the holocaust.

In Europe, a teacher can go to jail for misstating a number. Any lawyer that agrees to represent them is automatically imprisoned also. No, I am not kidding, this is law in Europe, law in Canada and it is ruthlessly enforced. Historians studying World War II who stumble upon "banned" or "disapproved" documents face years in prison.

Laws passed to protect Jews from crazed extremists, who like Adam Perlman are Jews themselves, are never enforced against Jews. How many hundreds of times did Americans watch Adam Perlman pretend to be the Al Qaeda spokeman, taking credit for 9/11 and ranting threats, always timed for a news cycle, an Israeli funding bill or the election of a political candidate willing to send American troops to fight Israel's wars of choice.

Perlman got as much publicity as Madonna until the fact he was a phony began to leak out. From that second on, it was as though he had vanished from the face of the earth. We are told that Blackwater teams are looking for him in Karachi, Paksitan. We might suggest some place else where they are more likely to find him.

The last thing Israel wants is people really looking at Gaza, 9/11, financial crimes in the US, the Israel lobby and the lies and massive corruption tied to these and other issues. Running a "circus" through exploiting the weak Sarkozy and Merkel governments of France and Germany, little but client states of Israel, requires almost no effort at all.

In fact, at the same time, Israel orchestrates hate campaigns against, not only the Roma, but Muslims across Europe. In fact, millions are spent every month in what can only be an attempt to organize a holocaust in Europe against Muslims. One has already begun in France against the Roma, once carefully orchestrated in Tel Aviv and put into motion by Nicholas Sarkozy, president of France and an ethnic Jew.

That president Sarkozy's plan to expel the ethnic Roma population of France, all legally residing in that country, in accordance with European Union laws, an illegal act deeply parallel to Israel's expulsion of Palestinians, may only be coincidental. Could Sarkozy's acts be inspired by Tel Aviv?

DID ISRAEL CREATE "HOLOCAUST DENIAL?"

We don't hear much about "historical revisionism" or "holocaust denial" in the United States. Any university, any journalist who would attempt to discuss such things would be crushed immediately and many have. In Europe it was different. The Germans hate the idea of, generation after generation, being blamed for being Nazi butchers. So, when certain aspects of the holocaust began to seem, let us say, "fictional" or "insubstantial," Germans and others jumped on it. Testimony, documentation and scientific evidence supplied by "revisionist" historians began to make a case, one some found compelling, that much of what was reported, seen in films, even testified to at Nuremberg, was simply invented. Thus began a controversy between two warring sides or are they two sides at all. What if one side was on both sides, fighting with itself just to seem like the offended party? It wouldn't be the first time.

No real historian denies the holocaust. 60 million died in World War II, most Russians. Doubting anything happened is insane and doubting that Jews were persecuted by the Nazis is without realistic basis. Additionally, any moralist will has to consider a single death a holocaust, the future of a single child, a disaster.

These are the real issues but "holocaust denial" was never about what was real or what was reasonable. There seemed only one reason for the "movement," to prove that there were enough dangerous and insane Nazi maniacs in Europe, even today, to require suspension of freedom of speech to silence them. Only one candidate for that honor can be found, Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France and, oddly enough, for those who are unaware, Sarkozy is a Jew.

Laws forbidding Holocaust Denialism, as it is called, throughout Europe and even in Canada are an admission that a substantial threat exists in those countries of the people rising up and murdering Jews. If the case for suspension of rights of speech and due process were, however, based on, not a dangerous mass movement but rather a few "false flag" actors working in conjunction with powerful Israeli owned press organizations throughout these nations, then who is the real victim?

However, rather than simply asking questions, it quickly went much further with cartoon character "neo-Nazi" types bragging about death camps or trying to make a hero out of Hitler and his gang of cut throats. There was a sudden explosion of crazy "holocaust denial" types, violent, dirty and evil. In order to protect the minds of impressionable European children, any discussion of the holocaust had to be immediately outlawed.

Problem is, the "crazy" holocaust denialists were Jews, same as with Adam Perlman, the famous American Al Qaeda spokesman whose grandfather ran the Anti-Defamation League.

Would Israel stage attacks on Jews simply to gain support from the United States or special laws protecting Jews in Europe and Canada? We know that Israel organized synagogue burnings in regions of Europe and North Africa in order to convince Jews to emigrate to Israel. This is now admitted and the reasons are explained as "necessary based on need at the time." The motives are there, the evidence is available. If Israel has been involved in organizing Holocaust Denial, much as with the current wave of accusations tying Israel to 9/11 and other terrorist acts, how can this be investigated without breaking laws?

Why the "Catch 22?"

December 2001 Funeral Announcement For Osama Bin Laden (Egyptian News Sources)

We have seen where, by attacking the holocaust, laws giving special privileges to Jews that no other group in the world enjoys were passed, laws that are unconstitutional in each nation that passed them.

The real question is not whether everything said by some happened or if more were killed, perhaps under even more brutal circumstances than films and television depict. The threat against Jews was exclusively European, there were no Arabs, no Muslims involved in any way. Thus, the continual use of the phrase "never again" has to be aimed exclusively at Western Europe where all participants in the holocaust against the Jews originated, all Christians, all white.

No Spielberg movie ever showed a Jew being gassed by a Berber or Persian.

Then the danger Israel is said to be protecting its citizens and the Jews of the world it claims to speak for is a European danger, Britain, France, Netherlands, Norway, Italy, Luxembourg, Austria, Belgium. Poland was under German or German/Russian control. Czech no longer existed nor did Slovakia.

Thus, we are being told that the real threat is a general uprising in Western Europe or perhaps a political movement meant to imprison and murder the Jews of those countries. There could be no other rationale as there is absolutely no evidence of attacks on Jews in any other area of the world.

What facts provide the basis of these beliefs?

THE THEORY OF "TRANSFERENCE"

In psychology, a common symptom of a personality disorder is "transference." This is a "stimulus/response" cycle gone awry, with the subject responding to a stimulus from one party by responding to an unrelated third party.

"Jack hits John so John must hit Jim back. (and bulldoze Mary's house)"

We have just defined the State of Israel.

"Jack kills John's grandmother so John must murder Khalid's granddaughter."

We have just defined the conflict between Jews and Palestinians.

"Jack kills John's grandmother so John must have Uncle Sam go on a rampage of global slaughter. The best part is that Jack's grandson agrees to help, proving how "decent" he is."

Welcome to the War on Terror. Please send in your address so we know where to mail your PhD in "Zionist Studies."

* Gordon Duff is senior editor of Veterans Today.

Related posts:

• Israel: Please, No More Bin Laden Tapes, Nobody Is Buying It!
• Jeff Gates- When Will Israel Attack the U.S. – Again?
• The Hate Mongers Among Us

By Grace Halsell

American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? President Bill Clinton as well as most members of Congress support Israel-and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers.

The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere-among those who support Israel but don't really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel-and Zionism-often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.

I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window- type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad "unChosen" enemies.

In my early 20s, I began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.

And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. "Not write about politics?" scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a water pipe in the Old Walled City. "We eat politics, morning, noon and night!"

As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.

My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was "free" to print news impartially.

"It shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel."

In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify "news" depending on who was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture.

Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn't it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn't know it was happening.

On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I'd make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn't known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were "lost" at WETA.

The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. "Terrific," he said of my material.

The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan's. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, "He's been fired." She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.

Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. "I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes," he told me. "They were not pleased. They asked me, ‘You are not going to publish this book, are you?' I asked, ‘Were there mistakes?' ‘Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn't be published. It's anti-Israel.'"

Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wan ton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.

The Same Question

Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, "How come I didn't know this?" Or someone might ask, "But I haven't read about that in my newspaper." To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?

I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post-and most of our nation's print media-are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israel-and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.

My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem-all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.

In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals. These books had come to the attention of the "mother" of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.

Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn. home.

She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, "You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew." I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered-from her point of view-the "wrong" underdog.

As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: "My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?" She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.

I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most "liberal" U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one-the Palestinians.

How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as "terrorists."

Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.

Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions-including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ-stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.

Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre, "We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own."

Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, "are not basing their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become ‘the Bible.' And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can kill a non-Jew with impunity."

In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.

The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does-even wanton murder-as orchestrated by God.

Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.

While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America-the well-meaning Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn't know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.

"They asked us," said one delegate, "‘Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn't you use an Israeli agency?'" The interrogation was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate, "The Israelis have a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except under their sponsorship. They don't want Christians to start learning all they have never known about Israel."

Washington, DC-based writer Grace Halsell is the author of 14 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics.

[Source: thepeoplesvoice.org, via wrmea.com]

Related posts:

• A War of Religions? God Forbid!
• Stop the lies in Congress regarding Palestinian Christians
• Did you know?

As usual, an attack on the Rabbi in Frankfurt and a murdered Jew in Uzbekistan are surely in all the newspapers... but neo-Nazi arrests in Israel surely is NOT! (It happened one month ago, but a GAG ORDER was only lifted yesterday... what other news do the Israelis have gag orders on??)

Related posts:

• Voice of the Empire! News Headlines…
• News that makes NO news: UK Rightists Threaten to Behead Muslims
• IOF filmed beating Palestinian youth and attacked by dogs

[Image by Ben Heine]

As much as Israel would like so much to blame it all on the Arabs, and Germany like to pretend that only "official" Neo Nazis are racists - The Israelis arrested NOT Arab Neo Nazi cell (and kept it quiet for a month) and Eva Herman - the darling of German TV news for about 20 years, not only anchoring the evening news, but with her own talk show and as moderator of many specials... - war fired.

Interior Minister: I'll consider revoking neo-Nazis' citizenship
By Roni Singer-Heruti, Haaretz Correspondent

According to police, the neo-Nazi cell comprised individuals who have distant ties to Judaism and nonetheless immigrated to Israel under the Law of Return, which grants all Jews the right to immigrate. (Sabbah note: Either they are Jews or they are not! And if they were granted instant citizenship they ARE!)

MK Ahmed Tibi of Ra'am Ta'al called on authorities to deal harshly with the cell, saying that it represents a "ludicrous and outrageous phenomenon, where people immigrated to Israel and received automatic citizenship under the Law of Return, while citizens of Nazareth and Taibe are not allowed to visit their own relatives merely due to the fact that they are Arabs."

Police have seized 5 kilograms of explosives, a pistol, and an M-16 assault rifle belonging to the group of neo-Nazi youths. Police believe the group intended to use the weapons against punk rockers in the city, with whom they often clash violently.

A gag order was lifted Saturday night on the arrest one month ago of the eight Petah Tikva teens, who are suspected of running the neo-Nazi cell.

The suspects, aged 17 to 19, confessed to assaulting dozens of people, mainly foreign workers around Tel Aviv's central bus station and Carmel market, causing many of them serious injury.

More details here!

Yet another one: Neo-Nazi violence flourishes - in Petah Tikva.

Update:

At least one has a Jewish mother, which makes him a full Hallachik Jew, and another has a Jewish father, I saw them admit on a TV news report... the stories are written in a way that implies that only distant relatives were Jewish and that is why they received Jewish citizenship....

There has been very little reported outside Israel about other problems of immigrated Russian Jews in Israel, such as the extreme right wing and racist attitudes of many, which are exemplified by politicians such as Avigdor Lieberman, who was appointed Minister of Strategic Affairs and Deputy Prime Minister by Ehud Olmert in 2006 and is head of the Yisrael Beyteynu political party. This party advocates "the unilateral transfer of Arab-Israeli communities to the Palestinian Authority". Which was actually the original Nazi concept of how to get rid of Jews. The other political party made up mostly of Russians is headed by Natan Sharansky - whom President Bush admires enormously - and though they are not extreme at Yisrael Beytenu, Sharansky not only participates in the marginalization of human rights advocacy that has become so prevalent in Israeli society, but simultaneously provides an excuse for ignoring international legal norms.

Americans seems to think that one can make instant democrats - like instant soup - out of people who have lived in totalitarian regimes, but the realities of East meeting West are much different. The Russians have brought crime and prostitution to Israel, as well as intolerance of other races. A huge problem, which, like so much in Israel, is swept under the rug, and totally ignored by American Jews and the media, who see Israel as some kind of utopia, though most have never even set foot in it.

David Cohen

Related posts:

• Israeli Police uncover weapons lab in home of Jewish settler
• Jewish only schools, roads, marriages, and of course, Jewish only land
• The new Nazis of Israel and USA